Page 6 - GLNG Week 14 2022
P. 6

GLNG                                          COMMENTARY                                               GLNG




       OIES weighs up impact of Western





       oil firms’ exit from Russia







       Russian oil and LNG prospects now look dimmer, as IOCs announce their departure or

       commit to no new investments



        PERFORMANCE      RUSSIAN oil and gas production is unlikely to   “Shell is withdrawing from the Sakhalin-2
                         be affected significantly in the short term by the  project and the major shareholder, Gazprom,
       WHAT:             departure of Western oil majors, but their exit  has limited experience of the LNG sector,” the
       Many IOCs are intending   could have an impact on long-term growth, the  OIES said. “However, it has been a major part-
       to leave Russia.  OIES has said in a report.           ner for the past 14 years and so will undoubt-
                           BP, Equinor, ExxonMobil and Shell have all  edly have acquired adequate skills to keep
       WHY:              announced plans to leave Russia, although it  production going in the absence of any major
       They have done so   remains to be seen how quickly they will be able  problems.”
       because of pressure over   to find buyers for their equity positions. Others   However, the institute notes that there is a risk
       Moscow’s invasion of   like OMV, TotalEnergies and Wintershall Dea  of outages given the departure of one of the most
       Ukraine.          are remaining, but have pledged not to commit  experienced international oil companies in the
                         to any new investments in the country.  LNG sector, and Shell may be removing some
       WHAT NEXT:          As far as gas pipeline supply is concerned, the  key technical equipment and software, which
       Short term, Russian oil   companies’ exit will have little impact on the  could undermine medium-term efficiency and
       and gas production is   simple gas fields that deliver supplies to Europe,  optimisation. It also seems unlikely Gazprom
       unlikely to be affected,   as Gazprom is capable of maintaining produc-  will realise its long-standing plan to develop a
       but in the long term, the   tion at these sites on its own, the OIES said. A  third liquefaction train at the site, or develop any
       story is different.  greater risk relates to the EU’s plan to reduce  new LNG projects.
                         Russian gas supply by as much as two thirds by   Russia’s other major LNG project is Yamal
                         the end of this year.                LNG, which is run by Novatek, a company that
                                                              “has demonstrated its huge competence in oper-
                         LNG nuances                          ating major projects over the past five years.”
                         As for Russian LNG, the situation is “slightly  What is more, its Western partner in the project,
                         more nuanced,” the OIES said.        TotalEnergies, has not left.


























                                                                                                  The prospects for the
                                                                                                  second and third trains
                                                                                                  at Arctic LNG-2 look “a
                                                                                                  little murkier” according
                                                                                                  to the OIES.


       P6                                       www. NEWSBASE .com                           Week 14   08•April•2022
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11