Page 5 - FSUOGM Week 25
P. 5

FSUOGM                                       COMMENTARY                                            FSUOGM



                         Kazakhstan’s failure to comply lies.  to the 9.7mn bpd cut, suggesting that the reduc-
                           Kazakhstan was widely seen as having dis-  tion will be eased to 7.7mn bpd at the end of this
                         regarded its commitments under the previous  month.
                         OPEC+ deal, which ran for over three years until   The onus is now on Kazakhstan and Iraq, as
                         the end of March 2020. Those cuts were agreed  well as other errant producers, to convince their
                         in November 2016, just one month after Kasha-  OPEC+ partners that they can be trusted. More
                         gan finally came on stream after years of delays  than any other member, Iraq will need to draw
                         and billions of dollars in cost overruns. The gov-  up a convincing plan for meeting its monthly
                         ernment and Kashagan’s shareholders resisted  quotas.
                         tampering with operations at the field, to order   “If OPEC+ sees that it cannot trust the mem-
                         to recoup some of the project’s mammoth invest-  bers for the alliance, it’s not for granted that the
                         ments as quickly as possible.        deal will be maintained,” Rystad’s Tonhaugen
                           Kazakhstan and Iraq have agreed to make  wrote on June 22. “The production cut levels we
                         deeper cuts than are necessary later this year  have now are unprecedented and the possibility
                         to compensate for their lack of compliance in  of living immediately without them and flooding
                         May. However, the OPEC+ deal does not set out  the market with oil once more [will definitely]
                         clearly how laggards should be punished for con-  send prices sky-diving again.”
                         tinually failing to meet their commitments.  Assuming demand remains stable and the
                           The global supply pact has succeeded in spur-  laggards keep their commitments and win the
                         ring the oil market’s recovery, with Brent once  trust of their partners, Rystad expects oil to rise
                         again trading in the lower $40s per barrel, com-  to between $40 and 45 per barrel before the next
                         pared with under $30 in early April. The recovery  OPEC+ meeting in less than four weeks.
                         in global fuel demand as COVID-19 lockdowns   However, producers’ efforts could be coun-
                         are eased has done even more to push up prices.  teracted by new coronavirus (COVID-19)
                         In their latest meeting, the OPEC+ ministerial  restrictions coming into force, depending on the
                         panel did not recommend any further extension  severity of the virus’ second wave. ™




       Turkmenistan keeps believing





       in pipe dream





       Turkmenistan is unlikely to give up on TAPI while Berdymukhammedov is still in power


        TURKMENISTAN     SINCE the 1990s, Turkmenistan has seeking to  widely reported at $10bn, leaving Turkmenistan
                         reach new markets for its natural gas by building  on the hook for $8.5bn, with its partners each
       WHAT:             a lengthy pipeline through Afghanistan, Paki-  covering $500mn. Turkmen state media claimed
       Reports say the target for   stan and into India. Decades on, it is still far from  in the past that the Saudi-based Islamic Devel-
       TAPI reaching financial   delivering on that ambitious plan.  opment Bank (IDB) and the Philippines-based
       close has been delayed.  The Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Paki-  Asian Development Bank (ADB) had offered a
                         stan-India (TAPI) project calls for the construc-  combined $1.5bn in project financing in 2016.
       WHY:              tion of an 1,800-km pipeline that would export  But such arrangements were never confirmed
       Security concerns   up to 33bn cubic metres (bcm) per year of Turk-  by the banks.
       continue to make   men gas. Turkmenistan formed the TAPI Pipe-  Several major international banks have
       sourcing financing   line Company (TPLC) in 2015 to manage the  expressed interest as well, including Deutsche
       difficult.        project, ceding 5% shares each to Afghanistan,  Bank, Credit Suisse and Credit Agricole, but no
                         Pakistan and India.                  firm commitments have been made.
       WHAT NEXT:          Under the latest schedule indicated by Turk-
       Turkmenistan’s president   men authorities, the project had been due to  Hurdles
       is extremely invested in   reach financial close before the end of 2019.  An obvious reason for investors’ reluctance to
       the project politically,   That goal was not met, though, and according to  back TAPI is security concerns in Afghanistan
       meaning it is unlikely to   Pakistani press reports this week, is unlikely to  and to a lesser extent in Pakistan. Insurgents
       be dropped.       be reached until 2021. Citing sources, the Kara-  remain very active in the regions that the pipe-
                         chi-based News International said this meant the  line would traverse. Another stumbling block
                         pipeline would not start flowing until 2023.  is lingering hostility between India and Paki-
                           Even this may be wishful thinking by the pro-  stan. The Indian government is concerned that
                         ject’s proponents. TAPI’s projected cost has been  Islamabad might use the pipeline’s gas flows as a



       Week 25   24•June•2020                   www. NEWSBASE .com                                              P5
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10