Page 20 - Vasoclick emagazine Issue2
P. 20

Contemporary Use of the Femoropopliteal Vein in Vascular Reconstructions                              19

 Discussion  popliteal vein and associated with :  harvested, remaining  deep  veins  after  FPV
 7
 Graft infection  following aortic  reconstruction   harvest, and the collateral vessels between the

 can cause mortality (10-25%) and  limb loss   1.  Significant  reflux  disease  in  the  veins   popliteal  vein  and profunda femoris  vein can
 (10-25%). A similar  incidence is  also reported   remaining after FPV harvest  prevent post-harvest morbidity. 7

 with mycotic aneurysms.  The  traditional
 methods of graft excision with extra-anatomic or   2. Absence of collateral veins from the   References:

 in situ bypass carry a graft-failure rate of almost   popliteal vein to profunda femoris  vein or   1) Aru RG, Horsley NB, Endean ED. Contemporary use of
 35% and re-infection  rates between 10-23%.    common femoral vein  the femoropopliteal vein in vascular reconstructions. Ann
 4
        Vasc Surg. 2022;79:145-152.
 Greater saphenous vein shows poor patency and   doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2021.07.019
 up  to 60% failure rates when used for  in-situ   Based  on  these  findings,  an  anatomic  “safe”   2) Hirsch JA, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Nicola GN, et al. Current

 reconstruction. 5  length of FPV to be harvested was determined   procedural terminology; a primer. J Neurointerv Surg.
        2015;7(4):309-312. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011156
    which included one valve in the distal profunda

 FPV  has several advantages for  autogenous   femoris  stump  (to prevent  reflux)  and one   3) CPT Advisor. Adjunctive use of the superficial femoral
        vein for vascular reconstructions. Sean P. Roddy.
 reconstruction post arterial and prosthetic graft   significant  collateral  vein  (more  than  2  mm  in   https://www.jvascsurg.org/arti-
        cle/S0741-5214(12)00483-1/pd-
 infections  with primary patency of 83-91%,   diameter) in the popliteal vein stump superior to   f#:~:text=The%20add%2Don%20CPT%20code,edition%20
 secondary patency of up to 100% at 5 years   the valve. In the given study, this length of FPV   of%20the%20CPT%20manual. Accessed June 2022

 (range: 7.4 months to 10 years), and limb salvage   harvested varied  from an average  of 40 cm in   4) Ehsan O, Gibbons CP. A 10-year experience of using
        femoro-popliteal vein for re-vascularisation in graft and
 rates of more than 85%. The five-year survival for   women to 50  cm  in  men when 15  cm  of the   arterial infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.

 the FPV  by-pass  was also better than the   popliteal vein in men and 13 cm in women was   2009;38(2):172-179. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.03.009
 prosthetic  replacement (60-70% vs 47-56%).    harvested  distal to the  inferior edge  of the   5) Daenens K, Fourneau I, Nevelsteen A. Ten-year experi-
 4
        ence in autogenous reconstruction with the femoral vein
 More than  one  study  has  shown  no   adductor hiatus. 7  in the treatment of aortofemoral prosthetic infection. Eur
        J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;25(3):240-245.
 late-treatment-related  mortality due  to the   doi:10.1053/ejvs.2002.1835

 complete absence of graft re-infection.  Any   Conclusion:
 4,5
        6) Hagino RT, Bengtson TD, Fosdick DA, Valentine RJ,
 unresolved infection was successfully shown to   FPV is a useful, almost universally available, and   Clagett GP. Venous reconstructions using the superficial
        femoral-popliteal vein. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26(5):829-837.
 be treated with further FPV grafts and rates of   durable option for a potential conduit. 1  doi:10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70097-1
 re-infection if reported were low. 4
        7) Santilli SM, Lee ES, Wernsing SE, Diedrich DA, Kuskows-
 FPV has been shown to be an excellent conduit   ki MA, Shew RL. Superficial femoral popliteal vein: An
        anatomic study. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31(3):450-455.
 FPV  is also an ideal  conduit  for  major venous   for  arterial  reconstruction  in  the presence of

 reconstructions due to its durability, availability,   prosthetic  graft infection and  provides better
 size,  and length.   But  there is  inconsistency   long-term survival. 4
 6
 regarding the incidence  of post-FPV-harvest
 morbidities like pain and swelling. This variation   Although the morbidity  related  to vein harvest

 is attributed to a lack of standards for length of   and system  complications  are high with  FPV
 vein harvested, preoperative venous evaluations,   conduits,  it can be explored  further for use in

 and postoperative care.   The venous  morbidity   vascular reconstruction. 1
 7
 associated with FPV  harvest has now been

 shown to be more likely caused by the harvest of   Studies  suggest that the length of vein
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25