Page 15 - Daniel
P. 15

Ezekiel, and discount the support by Christ in the New Testament. But
               conservative  scholars  have  given  almost  universal  recognition  to  the
               book of Daniel as an authentic sixth-century  B.C. composition of Daniel,

               the  captive  of  Nebuchadnezzar.  The  higher  critics’  arguments  will  be
               addressed in the later discussion of the genuineness of Daniel.



                                           PLACE IN THE SCRIPTURES


                  The book of Daniel, written last of all the major prophets, appears in

               this order among the major prophets in the English Bible. In the Hebrew
               Old Testament—divided into three divisions consisting of the Law, the
               Prophets, and the Writings, which is also called Kethubim (Hebrew) or
               Hagiographa  (Greek)—Daniel  is  included  in  the  third  section,  the
               Writings. In the Septuagint, Vulgate, and Luther, however, it is placed
               with the major prophets. Josephus also includes it in the second division

               of the Jewish canon, the Prophets, rather than in the Hagiographa. There
               is, therefore, general recognition of the prophetic character of the book.
                  Although Daniel’s ministry was prophetic, it was of different character

               than the other major prophets; and apparently for this reason, the Jews
               included Daniel in the Writings. As Wilson has pointed out, the reason
               for this was not that the Jews regarded Daniel as inferior nor because
               the  prophetic  section  of  the  canon  had  already  been  closed,  but  as
               Wilson states, “It is more probable, that the book was placed in this part
               of the Hebrew Canon, because Daniel is not called a nābhī’ (‘prophet’),

               but was rather a hōzeh (‘seer’) and a hākhām (‘wise man’). None but the
               works  of  the  nebhī’im  [prophets]  were  put  in  the  second  part  of  the
               Jewish Canon, the third being reserved for the heterogeneous works of
               seers, wisemen, and priests, or for those that do not mention the name or
               work of a prophet, or that are poetical in form.”             3

                  J. B. Payne observes, “For though Christ spoke of Daniel’s function as
               prophetic  (Matt.  24:15),  his  position  was  that  of  governmental  official
               and inspired writer, rather than ministering prophet (cf. Acts 2:29–30).”                    4
               In any case, the Jews did not regard the third division as less inspired,

               but only different in character. This is clearly demonstrated by the fact
               that  they  included  in  it  such  venerable  writings  as  Job,  Psalms  and
               Proverbs, the books of 1 and 2 Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther,
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20