Page 29 - JOP2020
P. 29

The treatment of lower eyelid retraction often   Methods
            involves the implantation of spacer materials to
            lengthen the vertical dimension of the eyelid, provide   Study design
            stability, or both. Acellular dermal collagen matrix   This article is a surgical-technique description and
            is an option that obviates a second surgical site with   retrospective case series of cases of the collagen splint
            autografts such as cartilage or hard palate. These   procedure performed by a single surgeon at an aca-
            bioengineered grafts may be additionally advanta-  demic oculoplastic surgery specialty referral practice.
            geous because they are durable and flexible; they offer   Institutional Review Board approval was obtained
            a uniform, predictable structure and thickness; and   for this study. This investigation was conducted in
            they demonstrate tissue tolerability and longevity   accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and
            after implantation. 6, 7,8  The graft material demonstrates   was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability
            good tensile strength and thus is used for a variety of   and Accountability Act. 16,17  Informed consent for use
            load-bearing applications such as repair of abdominal   of publication of photographs was obtained from
            wall defects. 8,9,10,11  Because these grafts are acellular,   subject(s) with photograph(s) relevant for illustrative
            they are purported to be less antigenic and carry fewer   purposes.
            transmission risks than other biologic grafts.  Several   Cases were identified through a billing database
                                                  12
            reports suggest they are effective and safe for implan-  search for lower eyelid retraction diagnoses codes
            tation in the lower eyelid. 6,7,13,14,15  Barmettler and Heo,    (ICD-9 or ICD-10) coupled with Current Procedural
                                                         14
            in a prospective, randomized trial, report that porcine   Terminology code 67911 for lower eyelid retraction
            acellular dermal matrix had similar outcomes com-  repair and 15275 for application of a skin substitute to
            pared with autologous cartilage or a bovine acellular   the eyelid or 17999 for unlisted eyelid procedure.
            matrix xenograft.                                    Inclusion criteria were patients with (a) an anoph-
               Acellular dermal matrix spacer grafts are usually   thalmic socket who had undergone the collagen splint
            implanted into the middle or posterior lamella by way   procedure, (b) refractory lower eyelid retraction on the
            of a transcutaneous or transconjunctival approach.   operated side, defined as at least one previous unsuc-
            Typically, these devices are tailored to fit within the   cessful surgical intervention for lower eyelid retraction
            confines of the medial and lateral canthus. This   repair, and (c) horizontal eyelid laxity on the operated
            configuration may offer support and vertical eyelid   side as determined by positive snap-back and eye-
            lengthening in uncomplicated cases of retraction. In   lid-distraction tests. A positive snap-back test was
            severe cases of lower eyelid retraction with significant   defined as failure of the lower eyelid to return to its
            laxity, this approach may be insufficient or prone to   initial position without blinking. A positive eyelid-
            allow recurrence.  Central placement may be inade-  distraction test defined as horizontal distraction of
                           6,7
            quate to support an eye prosthesis.               the lower eyelid >7 mm away from the globe. 16,17  Cases
               Herein, we describe a surgical technique for lower   were excluded based on the following criteria: (a)
            eyelid retraction repair, in which a porcine acellular    subject age <18 years and (b) follow-up interval <6
            dermal collagen implant is implanted to the mid-  postoperative months.
            dle eyelid lamella in the traditional manner but also   Data on demographic information, surgical history,
            extended past the lateral canthus and anchored to the   preoperative and postoperative oculofacial examina-
            lateral rim periosteum or temporalis fascia (hereafter   tion, including margin reflex distance-2 (MRD-2),
            also referred to as a “collagen splint”). We hypothesize   anesthesia specifics, follow-up interval, complica-
            that this approach may provide more robust sup-   tions, and subsequent lower eyelid surgeries were
            port in cases of refractory lower eyelid retraction and   extracted from the charts. A single clinician performed
            enable adequate prosthesis retention in patients with   all preoperative and postoperative assessments. All
            anophthalmic sockets.                             analyses in this investigation were post hoc, and the
                                                              surgical and clinical protocol did not deviate from
                                                              standard of care.










            JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC PROSTHETICS                             OCULAR PROSTHESIS RETENTION   |  27
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34