Page 107 - Ray Dalio - Principles
P. 107

Consider  Muhammad  Yunus,  for  example.  A  great
                       philanthropist,  he  has  devoted  his  life  to  helping  others.  He
                       received  the  Nobel  Peace  Prize  for  pioneering  the  ideas  of

                       microcredit and microfinance and has won the Congressional
                       Gold Medal, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the Gandhi
                       Peace  Prize,  and  more.  Yet  he  tested  low  on  “Concern  for
                       Others.” Geoffrey Canada, who has devoted most of his adult
                       life  to  taking  care  of  all  the  disadvantaged  children  in  a
                       hundred-square-block area of New York’s Harlem, also tested
                       low on “Concern for Others.” Bill Gates, who is devoting most

                       of his wealth and energy to saving and improving lives, tested
                       low as well. Obviously Yunus, Canada, and Gates care deeply
                       about  other  people,  yet  the  personality  tests  they  took  rated
                       them low. Why was that? In speaking with them and reviewing
                       the questions that led to these ratings, it became clear: When
                       faced with a choice between achieving their goal or pleasing

                       (or  not  disappointing)  others,  they  would  choose  achieving
                       their goal every time.

                          Through this investigative process, I learned that there are
                       distinctly  different  types  of  shapers.  The  most  important
                       difference lies in whether their shaping comes in the form of
                       inventing,  managing,  or  both.  For  example,  while  Einstein
                       shaped by inventing, he didn’t have to manage, and while Jack

                       Welch (who ran GE) and Lou Gerstner (who ran IBM) were
                       great  managers/leaders  of  people,  they  didn’t  have  to  be  as
                       inventive.  The  rarest  cases  were  people  like  Jobs,  Musk,
                       Gates,  and  Bezos,  who  were  inventive  visionaries  and
                       managed big organizations to build those visions out.

                          There are a lot of people who look like shapers, in that they

                       came up with a great idea and got it to the point where they
                       could sell it for a lot of money, but did not shape consistently.
                       Silicon Valley has many of these types; perhaps they should be
                       called  “inventors.”  I  also  saw  that  there  were  wonderful
                       leaders  of  organizations  who  weren’t  classic  shapers,  in  that
                       they didn’t come up with the original visions and build them
                       out;  rather,  they  entered  existing  organizations  and  led them
                       well. Only true shapers consistently move from one success to

                       another  and  sustain  success  over  decades,  and  those  are  the
                       people I want to bring to Bridgewater.
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112