Page 109 - Ray Dalio - Principles
P. 109

people are like to build pointillist pictures of them to help us
                       match  people  to  responsibilities  well.  Doing  this  in  an
                       evidence-based  way  would  enhance  the  idea-meritocratic

                       process of aligning people’s responsibilities with their merits.

                          While this all seemed so clear and commonsensical to me,
                       it was much harder to achieve in practice. About a year into
                       my transition, I saw that many new managers (and some older
                       ones)  still  couldn’t  see  the  patterns  of  people’s  behaviors
                       through time (in other words, they couldn’t connect the dots
                       between what people are like and the outcomes they produce).

                       Their reluctance to probe hard to get at what people are like
                       was making things more difficult.

                          But  then  I  had  a  breakthrough,  which  grew  out  of  an
                       observation that the challenges we were having with making
                       management decisions didn’t exist in our investment decision
                       making. I realized that, by using big data analytics and other
                       algorithms,  our  computers  could  connect  those  dots  more

                       efficiently  than  any  of  us  could,  just  as  they  had  helped  us
                       make  connections  in  the  markets.  These  systems  also  didn’t
                       have personal biases and emotional barriers to overcome, so
                       those being analyzed couldn’t be offended by the data-driven
                       conclusions the computers were coming up with. In fact, they
                       could  look  at  the  data  and  algorithms,  assess  them  for
                       themselves, and suggest changes if they wanted. We were like

                       scientists trying to develop tests and algorithms for analyzing
                       ourselves objectively.

                          On  November  10,  2012,  I  shared  my  thoughts  with  the
                       Management Committee in an email. Its subject line was “The
                       Path Out: Systemizing Good Management”:

                           It is now clear to me that the main difference behind why

                           the investment management part of Bridgewater is likely to
                           continue  to  do  well  and  most  of  the  other  parts  of
                           Bridgewater are unlikely to do as well (if we don’t change
                           how  we  are  operating)  is  that  the  decision-making
                           processes  for  investment  management  have  been  so
                           systemized  that  it’s  hard  for  people  to  screw  them  up
                           (because  they  are  largely  following  the  systems’

                           instructions)  while  the  other  areas  of  Bridgewater  are
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114