Page 43 - Bible Doctrines II w videos short

False Teachings on Hypostatic Union in Jesus Christ

Apollinarianism
103
This teaching was proposed by the bishop of Laodicea; Apollinaris. He taught that “one person of
Christ had a human body but not a human mind or spirit, and that the mind and spirit of Christ were
104
from the divine nature of the Son of God.” In his response, Grudem notes that “we have the
statement that he was truly man, of a reasonable soul and body . . .consubstantial with us according to
105
the Manhood; in all things like unto us (Consubstantial means “having the same nature or substance).

Nestorianism
Nestorius was a popular preacher and bishop in Antioch. On two natures in one
106
person (Jesus), he claimed that “there were two separate persons in Christ.” In the
Scriptures, we do not find places where a plural pronoun is used to refer to a singular
person. What we find is the use of singular pronoun, “I.” But Jesus used “we” when he
referred to both Himself and God the Father (John 14:23). Grudem says that
“Nowhere in Scripture do we have an indication that the human nature of Christ, for
107
example, is an independent person, deciding to do something contrary to the divine nature of Christ.”

Monophysitism (Eutychianism)
Monophysitism is a Greek compound word. Monos means “one,” and physis, “nature.” This teaching
108
states that “the human nature of Christ was taken up and absorbed into the divine nature, so that both
natures were changed somewhat and a third kind of nature resulted.” Scriptures are quiet concerning
the relationship between the divine and human nature after the incarnation. However, what is clear is
that it does not say that there was a third nature which was formed as a result of Jesus’ incarnation. His
teaching is not just foreign to Scriptures, but it is the most extreme.

The Hypostatic Union

42