Page 15 - Advanced Apologetics and World Views Revised
P. 15

generated.  A computer cannot make itself.  Ultimately, there must be something “un-caused” to cause
               everything else to come into existence. That “un-caused” cause is God.


                                       What is the Kalam Cosmological Argument
                                            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeKavDdRVIg




               Moral argument
               A fourth argument is known as the moral argument. The moral argument begins with the fact that all
               people recognize some moral code (that some things are right, and some things are wrong). Every time
               we argue over right and wrong, we appeal to a higher law that we assume everyone is aware of, holds
               to, and is not free to arbitrarily change. Right and wrong imply a higher standard or law, and law
               requires a lawgiver. Because the Moral Law transcends humanity, this universal law requires a universal
               lawgiver. This, it is argued, is God.

               In support of the moral argument, we see that even the most remote tribes who have been cut off from
               the rest of civilization observe a moral code like everyone else's. Although differences certainly exist in
               civil matters, virtues like bravery and loyalty and vices like greed and cowardice are universal. If man
               were responsible for that code, it would differ as much as every other thing that man has invented.
               Further, it is not simply a record of what mankind does—rarely do people ever live up to their own
               moral code. Where, then, do we get these ideas of what should be done? Romans 2:14-15 says that the
               moral law (or conscience) comes from an ultimate lawgiver above man. If this is true, then we would
               expect to find exactly what we have observed. This lawgiver is God.

               To put it negatively, atheism provides no basis for morality, no hope, and no meaning for life. While this
               does not disprove atheism by itself, if the logical outworking of a belief system fails to account for what
               we instinctively know to be true, it ought to be discarded. Without God there would be no objective
               basis for morality, no life, and no reason to live it. Yet all these things do exist, and so does God. Thus,
                                                              xiii
               this is the moral argument for the existence of God.


                                       The Moral Argument – Can you be Good without God?
                                            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxiAikEk2vU




                          Let’s Practice …




               1. In what ways does the human brain validate the existence of a Creator God?




                                                             14
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20