Page 152 - ENTREPRENEURSHIP Innovation and entrepreneurship
P. 152

53231_Innovation and Entrepreneurship.qxd  11/8/2002  10:50 AM  Page 145




                                 Entrepreneurial Management             145

                 The same holds true for the public-service institutions, and espe-
              cially for those discharging nonpolitical functions, whether owned by
              government and financed by tax money or not; for hospitals, schools,
              and  universities;  for  the  public  services  of  local  governments;  for
              community  agencies  and  volunteer  organizations  such  as  the  Red
              Cross, the Boy Scouts, and the Girl Scouts; for churches and church-
              related organizations; but also for professional and trade associations,
              and  many  more. A  period  of  rapid  change  makes  obsolete  a  good
              many of the old concerns, or at least makes ineffectual a good many
              of the ways in which they have been addressed. At the same time,
              such a period creates opportunities for tackling new tasks, for exper-
              imentation, and for social innovation.
                 Above all, there has been a major change in perception and
              mood in the public domain (cf. Chapter 8). A hundred years ago,
              the “panic” of 1873 brought to an end the century of laissez faire
              that had begun with Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations in 1776. For
              a hundred years from 1873 on, being “modern,” “progressive,” or
              “forward-looking” meant looking to government as the agent of
              social change and betterment. For better or worse, that period has
              come to an end in all non-Communist developed countries (and
              probably in the developed Communist countries as well). We do
              not yet know what the next wave of “progressivism” will be. But
              we do know that anyone who still preaches the “liberal” or “pro-
              gressive” gospel of 1930—or even of 1960, of the Kennedy and
              Johnson years—is not a “progressive” but a “reactionary.” We do
              not know whether privatization,* that is, turning activities back
              from government to nongovernmental operation (albeit not nec-
              essarily  to  operation  by  a  business  enterprise,  as  most  people
              have interpreted the term) will work or will go very far. But we
              do  know  that  no  non-Communist  developed  country  will  move
              further  toward  nationalization  and  governmental  control  out  of
              hope, expectation, and belief in the traditional promises. It will
              do so only out of frustration and with a sense of failure. And this
              is  a  situation  in  which  public-service  institutions  have  both  an
              opportunity  and  a  responsibility  to  be  entrepreneurial  and  to
              innovate.
                 But precisely because they are public-service institutions, they face
              specific different obstacles and challenges, and are prone to making

                 A word that I coined in 1969 in The Age of Discontinuity (New York: Harper &
              Row; London: William Heinemann).
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157