Page 47 - ENTREPRENEURSHIP Innovation and entrepreneurship
P. 47

53231_Innovation and Entrepreneurship.qxd  11/8/2002  10:50 AM  Page 40




              40                 THE PRACTICE OF INNOVATION

              lobbied for it, or because a good customer asked for it and could not be
              turned down. But nobody expects it to sell; in fact, nobody wants it to
              sell. And then this “dog” runs away with the market and even takes the
              sales which plans and forecasts had promised for the “prestige,” “qual-
              ity” line. No wonder that everybody is appalled and considers the suc-
              cess  a  “cuckoo  in  the  nest”  (a  term  I  have  heard  more  than  once).
              Everybody is likely to react precisely the way the chairman of R. H.
              Macy reacted when he saw the unwanted and unloved appliances over-
              take his beloved fashions, on which he himself had spent his working
              life and his energy.
                 The unexpected success is a challenge to management’s judgment.
              “If the mini-mills were an opportunity, we surely would have seen it
              ourselves,” the chairman of the big steel company is quoted as saying
              when he turned the mini-mill proposal down. Managements are paid
              for their judgment, but they are not being paid to be infallible. In fact,
              they are being paid to realize and admit that they have been wrong—
              especially when their admission opens up an opportunity. But this is
              by no means common.
                 A Swiss pharmaceutical company today has world leadership in
              veterinary medicines, yet it has not itself developed a single veteri-
              nary  drug.  But  the  companies  that  developed  these  medicines
              refused  to  serve  the  veterinary  market.  The  medicines,  mostly
              antibiotics, were of course developed for treating human diseases.
              When the veterinarians discovered that they were just as effective
              for animals and began to send in their orders, the original manufac-
              turers were far from pleased. In some cases they refused to supply
              the veterinarians; in many others, they disliked having to reformu-
              late the drugs for animal use, to repackage them, and so on. The
              medical  director  of  a  leading  pharmaceutical  company  protested
              around 1953 that to apply a new antibiotic to the treatment of ani-
              mals was a “misuse of a noble medicine.” Consequently, when the
              Swiss  approached  this  manufacturer  and  several  others,  they
              obtained  licenses  for  veterinary  use  without  any  difficulty  and  at
              low cost. Some of the manufacturers were only too happy to get rid
              of the embarrassing success.
                 Human medications have since come under price pressure and are
              carefully scrutinized by regulatory authorities. This has made veteri-
              nary medications the most profitable segment of the pharmaceutical
              industry. But the companies that developed the compounds in the first
              place are not the ones who get these profits.
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52