Page 4 - The Irony Board
P. 4

Introduction


            Thus  brevity  and  wit  are  both  means  and  ends  in  Gluckman’s
         work.  He  seems  to  take  childish  pleasure  in  expressing  an  often
         serious idea humorously in few words, preferably with a final twist;
         proverbs, slogans and newspaper headlines are his ideal. Minimizing
         the word count creates an environment in which symbols both stand
         out clearly and interact easily. A word, in his view, is surrounded by
         a cloud of associations; the proximity of significant words is a factor
         in  the  depth  of  their  mutual  significance.  This  fact  is  crucial  in
         setting  up  accidental  homonyms  and  controlling  the  resultant
         ambiguities in puns.
            Short lines and stanzas also enhanced another technique to which
         he was partial: shuffling syntax and repeating patterns to confuse or
         bemuse  the  reader.  This  appears  contrary  to  making  sense,  but  it
         reflects an opinion he held regarding the ambiance of a poem. The
         mind  accustomed  to  prose  tends  to  race  through  poetry  as  well,
         attempting to grasp single meanings in long strings of language. He
         tries to operate against that process by forcing  the  reader to slow
         down or stumble, to weigh individual words against others not very
         distant, to squint mentally and scan a small structure for clues about
         its construction.
            This attitude is manifest in his architectural, rather than literary,
         conception of poetry. To Gluckman, syllables, lines, and stanzas are
         building blocks set into a two-dimensional grid. For that reason he
         often  did  not  capitalize  the  first  word  in  a  line  nor  routinely
         punctuate  in  his  early  works,  convinced  that  the  conventions  of
         prose should not impose artificial emphases disruptive of flow and
         balance.  With  passing  years  his  attitude  changed,  and  he  often
         revised  such  pieces  by  imposing  upon  them  conventions  of
         prosody—perhaps in an attempt to make them appear less jejune.

         Metaphor and image

             On the largest scale, Gluckman aspired to create poems with at
         least two interpretations, each of which could be mapped onto the
         other.  This requires close correspondence of word associations, and



                                          2
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9