Page 34 - Ruminations
P. 34

32. Mysteria and the movies

         Thanks to the unwitting efforts of Rudolf Otto and William James
       in the early twentieth century, the origin, function and exploitation of
       the human capacity for irrational belief and behavior are much clearer.
       By initiating analysis and categorization of what they thought were real
       experiences  of  the  supernatural,  they  opened  the  door  to
       understanding such phenomena in a wider context. James called them
       mystical; Otto used the term “numinous”. The American covered a lot
       of territory, but the German’s idea of the numinous is more useful.
         What enters the stream of consciousness for analysis is of either
       known or unknown origin. The former is provided by memory and
       sensory perception; the latter remains mysterious, leading to irrational
       explanation  and  emotional  reaction.  Beyond  the  modern
       understanding  of  the  sporadic  outbursts  or  chronic  sublimations  of
       repressed  unconscious  knowledge,  pre-human  biology  provides
       another source: the survival value of what is popularly known as the
       sixth  sense.  Other  animals  do  not  interpret  the  reasons  for  their
       responses  to  subtle  stimuli—they  have  neither  the  time  nor  the
       capacity for that reflection.
         But we humans believe that the entirety of incoming information
       about  the  physical  world  is  provided  by  what  can  be  consciously
       experienced. The older processing of subliminal stimuli by the brain,
       when it obtrudes into awareness, can therefore produce the idea of an
       invisible  external  presence.  That  presence  corresponds  to  Otto’s
       numinous  entities;  it  is  easily  misinterpreted  as  manifestation  of
       transcendent spiritual beings and thus manipulable socially.
         Otto discerned two types of these mysteria: tremendum (frightening,
       negative)  and  fascinans  (attractive,  positive).  These  two  numinous
       obtrusions  are  easily  appropriated  by  religion;  whence  they  may  be
       embedded in a child’s early development of consciousness while it is
       vulnerable  to  impositions  of  belief.  The  media-invoked  state  of
       consciousness called “suspension of disbelief” is an ancient method of
       confirming and reinforcing the experience of the numinous. It is a way
       of bypassing normal sensory validation and tapping into responses to
       a mysterium: terror, awe and wonder, leading to catharsis. Supernatural
       horror  movies  combine  tremendum  and  fascinans  into  box-office
       dynamite.  Disbelief  is  easy  to  suspend  in  this  context:  it’s  had  the
       stuffing scared out of it.
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39