Page 5 - Boundedness Revisited
P. 5

shaved  by  the  barber,  and  those  shaving  themselves  and  not
          shaved  by  the  barber;  the  barber  is  excluded  from  both  groups
          and therefore is not in the town; however, he must be in the town
          to  distinguish  the  two  groups.”  In  both  cases  the  paradox  is
          resolved by identifying an invalid unclosed inside.

                b. Irrational insides
             The  fluctuations  of  this  type  of  invalid  inside  result  from
          definitions  based  on  indefinitely  recurring  functions.  Each
          occurrence or calculation of the function gives a new size of the
          inside, which is said to approach a limit (which it cannot reach,
          and thus to which it cannot be equivalent). As expressed by a ratio
          of two whole numbers, an irrational “number” is incomplete; it is
          therefore an invalid unclosed inside. Examples are 1/3, the square
          root of 2, and pi. The relationship of boundedness to number is
          further considered below.

            2. Nonfictional boundaries

             The aspects of boundedness denied by boundaries defined as
          nonfictional  are  the  continuity  and  arbitrariness  of  insides  and
          their  outsides.  Since  one  aspect  cannot  be  denied  without  the
                                                8
          other, they may be considered together.  On a mundane level, the
          use  of  nonfictional  boundaries  may  be  called  simple  reification.
          Mechanisms of perception lead to the isolation or disconnection
          of insides from their outsides; the feeling that such distinctions are
          “objective” or not purely a function of perception does not stand
          up to the reduction accomplished by boundary analysis.
             On a more grandiose level, the intentional denial of continuity
          found  in  scientific  and  religious  theories  creates  what  may  be
          called absolute nonfictional boundaries. These definitions reduce
                                                          9
          to “X is outside Y but is not continuous with Y.”  In such cases,
          analysis invalidates the inside or outside as well as the boundary

          8   That  is,  their  denial  reduces  to  the  same  nonfictionality  of  a  purported
          boundary. Discontinuity means separation; ergo inside and outside have a real
          boundary  or  a  non-excluded  middle.  Non-arbitrary  means  real  or  objective,
          ergo an end to X absolutely discontinuous with Y.

          9  See footnote 2, in reference to macroscopic and microscopic limits.

                                         4
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10