Page 58 - Psychoceramics and the Test of Fire
P. 58

Homeostatopia

        from  what  was  publicly  presented—unlike  a  couple  of  the
        psychoceramics  I  had  already  assisted.  He  was  quite  gregarious,
        depending,  he  knew,  upon  gaining  widespread  support  for  his
        proposals.  His  early  professional  life  had  been  in  public  relations,
        after  a  lackluster  academic  career  in  the  social  sciences.  He  was
        happiest as a facilitator, an idea man brought in to consult by local
        and  regional  governments  looking  for  large-scale  reform  of
        organizations  and  institutions.  He  had  to  be  a  bit  of  a  salesman
        himself to navigate those tricky waters; I was a comparative amateur,
        I realized after reading his biography, and would need to avoid any
        confrontation  in  which  both  parties  suddenly  realized  they  were
        being  conned  by  the  other  and  broke  off  negotiations.  But  he
        expected  uncritical  enthusiasm  from  his  followers:  I  had  to  walk  a
        narrow line between the due diligence of an investor and the abject
        admiration  of  a  sycophant.  Distasteful  work?  Not  for  what  I  was
        being paid!
          I stopped to crack open an electrolyte beverage—it didn’t matter
        where, in the shadeless wasteland I was traversing.  I kept the engine
        on  and  the  air  conditioner  running  while  I  rehydrated.  Certainly
        Peña’s followers had to be dedicated to put up with this inhospitable
        environment: I wondered how many I’d find in Nodal Village. And
        not for the first time marveled at the evolution of hubris in the clients
        chosen by Al Magnus for their appointment with destiny. Was prior
        success or failure more likely to breed irrational belief in the rightness
        of  one’s  cause  to  the  point  of  social  isolation?  I  was  beginning  to
        look for the common thread in these crackpots: aberrance or useful
        mutation  within  the  human  gene  pool?  Nature  or  nurture?  Yet  I
        knew enough also to question my own role as a participant-observer
        in  Al  Magnus’s  vast  experiment  in  expiation  and  vindication.  The
        money was as good for me as those I rewarded—in proportion to
        our ambitions—and I had no axe to grind, no pet theory to prove, so
        I had no difficulty suspending judgment.
          Back  on  track  I  reflected  on  Peña’s  last  big  notion  before  he
        headed  for  the  desert.  A  large  Midwestern  city,  squeezed  by
        constricting budgets and expanding populations of entitlement, let it
        be  known  among  the  elite  cadre  of  social  planners  that  desperate
        times  called  for  innovative  solutions.  Peña,  whose  proposal  was
                                       56
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63