Page 316 - The Legacy of Abraham Rothstein - text
P. 316

Studies: human

              book. its aura, therefore, is curiously Christian; could AR have
              intended that? Further, the woman’s head, arm, and the babe
              she holds are too small in relation to the massive tapering cone
              of her body. This disproportion is the opposite of that seen in
              his pieces where the head is several times too large, signifying
              the  importance  of  the  character’s  mental  faculties;  perhaps  a
              meaning just as antithetical is implied here. Rather than being
              simply  an  att6empt  to  render  a  subject  in  the  “classical”
              manner,  the  statuette  may  embody  an  element  of  criticism,
              although  not  as  strong  as  that  evident  in  the  Moslem  figure
              (no. 4). The mother and baby smile at the observer, and the
              infant reaches out to her in a touching gesture, but their visible
              features are dwarfed by the strongly incised tower of drapery
              on which they rest.

              The  vaguely  “Madonna”  quality  is  diminished  in  no.  156  by
              rather  more  modern  clothing.  The  woman’s  head  is  not
              covered, and her hair is done up in a topknot. She wears a long
              dress down to the base of the figure.  The infant is dressed in a
              shirt closed in the front, not a garment from the biblical era.
              Again, both mother and baby are looking straight ahead—not
              at each other, typical in AR’s work—and she is smiling, subject
              to  the  sculptor’s  difficulties  with  lips.  The  piece  was  carved
              from  a  block,  so  it  has  a  rather  squarer  shape  than  others
              beginning with a branch of a tree. It is possible that someone
              known  to  AR  is  represented  here,  or  that  a  certain  type  of
              woman  is  being  portrayed;  categorizing  the  figure  as  a  study
              with  the  other  two  of  similar  motif,  rather  than  as  a  genre
              piece, is somewhat arbitrary.















                                       312
   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321