Page 125 - An Evening with Maxwell's Daemons
P. 125

The Universal Human Interface

          “The corporation first  to market with this technology  will  not
        merely  make  a  lot  of  money,  but  instantly  become  the  apex
        predator of personal information. It would dwarf what computers
        and mobile phones collect. Therefore its power would be an order
        of  magnitude  greater  than  any  present  media  company  or
        government. Following a well-established model of acceptance, the
        implications of its technology will be seen first in a positive light—
        the capacity for every human being to interact with every device—
        and then, too late to stop it, humanity will perceive its darker side.
        Let  us  call  that  company  UHI,  acronym  for  universal  human
        interface;  its  motto:  ‘the  interface  is  the  system”;  and  its  small
        number  of  opponents  the  usual  isolated  bands  of  Luddites,
        doomsayers and tree-huggers. That’s the near-future world I want
        to set in motion: what will happen in it or to it? Is it sustainable?
        Will  it  unite  the  disparate  and  warring  tribes  of  humanity  and
        incompatible video formats? What do you think?”
          “I think you just swallowed humanity whole by making life too
        easy,”  said  Izzy  Azimuth.  “It  may  be  true  that  the  goal  of
        technological innovation is a frictionless environment for our weak
        and  confused  species,  but  that  way  lies  utter  dissolution  of  our
        brains  as  problem-solving  organs.  Would  you  have  the  UHI
        injected  into  a  newborn’s  head,  like  a  microchip  ID  tag  for  a
        domestic animal? Well, that does put the onus on you, of course, to
        draw the line between not enough and too much assistance from
        our external  systems, mechanical  or electronic. And therefore  the
        issue  of  personal  freedom  versus  the  common  good  comes  up.
        Humans  haven’t  figured  out  on  their  own  how  to  interface  with
        each  other—at  any  scale  of  aggregation,  from  the  family  to  the
        global  community  of  billions—so  it’s  once  again  the  choice  of
        accepting the limits of what may be a neutral and objective arbiter
        and  distributor  of  rewards  and  punishments,  or  perish.  But  you
        have already compromised the honesty of the system by putting it
        in the human hands of a commercial corporation. The way out of
        that dilemma, since this is fiction as well as scientific extrapolation,
        is  to  stage  some  kind  of  coup  at  the  top  of  that  management,



                                      124
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130