Page 97 - An Evening with Maxwell's Daemons
P. 97

Sweet Oblivium

        requirements of empiricism cannot escape some of its assumptions
        and  Pavlovian  conclusions.  No,  I  am  proposing  a  hypothetical
        provision of the initial response to the desired comestible without
        the rapid decline in pleasure occurring with its actual introduction
        to  the  digestive  system.  Although  as  a  species  we  have  a  great
        overlap  in  what  is  considered  delicious  and  delightful,  individual
        tastes  differ  sufficiently  to  be  amenable  to  a  fairly  wide  range  of
        flavors  and  aromas.  Sweet  Oblivium,  therefore,  would  be
        customized  based  on  the  data  I  already  described.  Its  purchaser,
        having yielded both that information and a certain minimal price for
        a sample of the stuff, would receive by post a small vial of liquid or
        powder compounded to be the most wonderful thing he or she has
        ever  tasted  or  smelled.  And  it  will  not  be  by  custom  staled,  as
        Shakespeare has it: nothing to trigger satiety; and it will also contain
        a  new  food-derived  biochemical  designed  to  suppress  the  dose-
        dependent tolerance and consequent reduction in attractiveness of
        the compound.”
          “What won’t be publicized is that people with active or potential
        addictive personalities will not be able easily to cease consumption
        of  Sweet  Oblivium.  They  will  be  the  first  to  return  to  purchase
        more—and learn that the price goes up by an order of magnitude
        for repeat orders. Think about it: how many times a day would you
        want that ultimate experience? No drug could match it. But is it a
        drug or an herbal supplement? It’s either a brilliant manifestation of
        disruptive corporate behavior profiting a few at the expense of the
        many, or it’s criminal. How would I proceed with a situation that
        might not be tenable in even the medium-term?”
          “Are you kidding?” asked Fred Feghootsky. “You’ve got a lot of
        possibilities.  The  more  unstable  the  better!  Strong  defense  and
        opposition!  Lawyers  and  scientists  and  computer  geeks,  all
        sleazeballs! I would just close my eyes and throw a dart at a tacked-
        up list of people and parties involved with this, and run with that
        choice. Or decide who really has a plan for tackling this malicious
        octopus, and make that person your protagonist. That, of course,
        would commit you to choosing the least corrupt among a rogue’s
        gallery of contemporary types. As a cynic, I would pick someone

                                       96
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102