Page 6 - 15_PBC to Begg_10-5-16 (11pp)

-6-
refuting your various untruths, lengthy correspondence to digest and letter writing, leaving aside professional advice and briefings, couriers, photocopies of email correspondence now in excess of 460 pages etc etc which I hope Mrs Hillgarth is made fully conversant with. As you will appreciate, this time and costs has noth- ing whatsoever to do with supplying the requested invoices, but simply disproving the comments made in your correspondence to date most notably those made [and disproved] in your 23 March 2016 letter.
In the seemingly stubborn absence of your (and/or Mrs Hillgarth’s) apologies and confirmations of the now thoroughly disproved untrue statements made by Mrs Hillgarth in your correspondence to date we are obvi- ously obliged to continue sending you reams of correspondence to further disprove Mrs Hillgarth’s mischief at yet more expense to Mrs Hillgarth. And we do have reams more when required.
Fees and costs I might add to be totally reimbursed to MHML by Mrs Hillgarth on presentation of our invoice within 30 days of receipt of the requested and hopefully to be supplied by return at some stage (if your legal opinion insists),13 invoices. Or we will pursue Mrs Hillgarth through the courts, admittedly the Small Claims process. One hopes your account will also be fully paid but I’m hopeful you too will also be in receipt of an M. Hillgarth experience once push comes to shove at which stage you will appreciate the predicament we have tolerated for years...but are not willing to tolerate any longer!
I list below the attached documents A-ZZ to this letter (which you will note are 99% of polite and informative emails from 2012 to present date leaving aside the two or three offending emails, written under exacting extenuating circumstances as I’ve already made clear and explained and were only in evidence in early mid September when Mrs Hillgarth was at her most active unpleasantness with gossip and falsifications and mis- informing other lessees who regrettably, despite her steering them into a previously failed RTM still seemed intent on following her poor advice and false observations and as referred to above, proved conclusively the bad apple analogy). And don’t forget we were in the first flurry of the works’ schedule commencing as it did Sunday 31st August 2014 (which, and this you will not believe but it’s true, Mrs Hillgarth requested in an email dated 16 December 2014 at 13.00h “Proof of council and police permission which has allowed you to bring in scaffolders to work on unauthorised days and times (namely Sundays)”
This totally arbitrary irrelevant request [and in our opinion a near perfect example of Mrs Hillgarth’s desperate measures to embarrass MHML on any occasion] was made firstly 5 months into the works and secondly 2 weeks once they were completed. Do you consider this demand either relevant or sane?
LIST OF COPY CORRESPONDENCE ATTACHED
A-ZZZ - date order with brief reference - approx 5% of all on file
A_19 Sept 2011 - KFH £120 Fees for Notice of Transfer and Charge v MHML £35 as charged to one lessee B_7 October 2014 - Flat 4 additional SkyTV works £250 being same as that charged to Mrs Hillgarth
C_12 September 2014 - Same cost to two other lessees for keys as that charged to Mrs Hillgarth
D_29 April 2016 - formal Solicitor’s letter to comply with lease covenants
not date order - misc:
E_27 October 2014 (11.11h) - to Flat 9 ref the Lift decor
F_27 October 2014 (11.56h) - to Flat 9 ref usual queries
G_27 October 2014 - Surveyor collecting Window Repair cheques organised by MHML
H_27 October 2014 (19.10h) - to all lessees - ref Mrs Hillgarth’s contrariness in changes of opinions I_22 October 2014 (22.34h) - to all lessees - ref Flat 4’s neutrality and dislike of any suggestions
J_8 October 2014 - letter to all lessees re: s.20 Notice for Water Tank and relevant information
K_1 October 2014 (16.27h) - to all lessees re: no consensus, no funds paid as agreed to be paid etc
L_1 october 2014 (20.01h) - to all lessees re: non payments etc
M_23 September 2014 (12.01h) - to all lessees from Mrs Hillgarth re: website
N_22 September 2014 (09.40h) - to all lessees re: deserved abuse without doubt three weeks into works O_22 September 2014 (14.21h) - to all lessees re: deserved admonishments for continued ignorance P_19 September 2014 - letter from Flat 9 re Window Repairs (no reason to have gone to the effort?) Q_19 September 2014 (23.24h) - to all lessees re: windows and other relevant works’ concerns
R_18 September 2014 (00.19h) - to all lessees re: the regular reminder of available information!
S_18 September 2014 (20.09h) - to Mrs Hillgarth (MH) re Windows cheque.....!
T_18 September 2014 (20.17h) - to Flat 8 (Leigh-Pemberton) - re Windows cheque.....!
U_17 September 2014 (18.42h) - from MH (Mrs Hillgarth...) “Yes I agree with installation.” (TVSky) V_16 September 2014 (12.46h) - from MH to all lessees re: Windows Repairs confirmation
W_16 September 2014 (13.23h) - from Flat 8 (Leigh-Pemberton) - re Windows cheque.....!
X_16 September 2014 (13.33h) - to Flat 8 (Leigh-Pemberton) - re Windows cheque.....!
date order in part (plus misc at end):