Page 7 - 15_PBC to Begg_10-5-16 (11pp)

Y_16 September 2014 (14.11h) - from Flat 8 (Leigh-Pemberton) - re Windows cheque.....!
Z_16 September 2014 (14.19h) - to Flat 8 (Leigh-Pemberton) - re Windows cheque.....!
AA_16 September 2014 (14.28h) - from Flat 8 (Leigh-Pemberton) - re Windows cheque.....! BB_16 September 2014 (14.49h) - to Flat 8 (Leigh-Pemberton) - re Windows cheque.....!
EE_15 September 2014 (18.33) - to all lessees - a good idea or not re Window Repairs
DD_15 September 2014 (18.43) - from Flat 3 re: Windows Repairs - pay individually
CC_15 September 2014 (18.47) - to Flat 3 re: Windows Repairs - dealbreaker - good news indeed FF_9 September 2014 (02.40h) - to Flat 9 - yet another funding analysis
-7-
all above 9 September to 27 October were in the midst of the scheduled workings.... hardly cricket? HH_12 August 2014 (00.04h) - from Flat 9 to all lessees - usual ignorant query orchestrated by MH GG_10 August 2014 (15.23 - to all lessees - electrics (to be done prior to commencement of works 1/9/14 II_7 August 2014 - letter to all lessees re: upcoming works schedule and contact details + to freeholder Ins JJ_7 July 2014 (10.19h) - to all lessees - benefit in kind of scaffolding in place?
KK_25 March 2014 - letter to all lessees with March Quarterly Demands - note website mention re: docs/info LL_15 November 2012 (23.49h) - to Flat 9 re: serious queries requiring answers - orchestrated by MH MM_8 July 2012 - letter from Mr Karupiah (Director) to Flat 4 re: vote rigging etc
NN_28 June 2012 (09.25h) - from Flat 4 to all lessees re: her opinions
OO_9 June 2012 (19.45h) - from Flat 4 re: voting opinions (see X marks)
PP_7 June 2012 (15.03h) - from MH “I am sorry to be so annoying so to make it up why don’t you chose.” QQ_7 June 2012 (09.58) - from Flat 8 (Leigh-Pemberton) “Re the decorations at Mitre House, I am in favour of option B” (Option (B) being MHML’s preference!
RR_25 March 2012 (18.33h) - from Flat 3 - all’s well until MH starts her bad apple routine
SS_13 September 2014 (11.07h) - From Mrs Hillgarth & reply - eleven days into works’ schedule
TT_11 September 2014 (16.42h) - ref contrariness - contacting surveyor etc
UU_13 September 2014 (16.13h) - to all lessees update and list of contrariness
VV_28 April 2014 (17.55h) - to Mrs Hillgarth - thought to be a final agreement....and peace at last! But this particular small bundle amply evidences Mrs Hillgarth’s total untrustworthy contrariness - totally! So much so I even requested if indeed she’d sent her subsequent email after her visit in error? I just could not believe it.? WW_27 September 2014 (14.27) - Tank and TVSky install information and Flat 9 queries answered
XX_15 April 2014 (18.51h) - to Mrs Hillgarth - call your dogs off being a short precis of her scheming...
YY_15 September 2014 (14.56h) - various correspondence and accusations and replies
ZZ_ 12 Aug 2014 - Impertinence based on my flat refurb perpetrated by Mrs Hillgarth for her own benefit? ZZZ_18 December 2015 (03.07h) - reply to Flat 9 with good analysis of various budget amounts.
The above very small collection of the 1600 -1800 odd emails/letters/correspondence on file (all unedited and containing conversations) amply evidence our good management abilities with correct paperwork, correct information, and correct language (save for where inappropriate on a few examples). If you and Mrs Hillgarth do not withdraw the slurs and accusations made against myself and MHML we will simply keep sending more copy correspondence in support of our claims that all slurs and accusations were simply untrue malicious and malevolent spite, perpetrated by Mrs Hillgarth to the distinct disadvantage of all lessees causing they and our- selves, also as lessees, a great deal of wasted time (2 years delay) and costs (a way, way too big a spend on externals and internals decor budget due solely to Mrs Hillgarth’s meddling). We could have saved a fortune.
In truth, it doesn’t matter which email we refer to on file (and probably a few lost due to technical reasons) the very same comments, reminders, admonishments, requests, same replies ad nauseum, are fully apparent. Those examples previously sent to you, including Mrs Hillgarth’s correspondence with previous agents which perfectly evidence her contrariness, and the attached to this bundle fully evidence a continuance of this con- trariness. (ref: VV read in conjunction with other documents attached to it for proof perfect of this contrariness).
Would it now be fair to agree that based on the various and varied documentation we have supplied since your letter of 23 March 2016 plus the various comments we attached to your letters to date, that:
a) we have fully answered all queries without “chaff”..?
b) we have proved without a shadow of doubt we did exactly as we’d said we’d done in correspondence?
c) can we rely on you and Mrs Hillgarth to review all the various information we have supplied to date and re- confirm or withdraw your opinion(s) we are unfit to be managing Mitre House due to incompetence, causing as you stated, chaos, amongst other platitudes and observations?
d) and having viewed our various supplied documentation you concur we have done a very admirable job?