Page 891 - Accounting Principles (A Business Perspective)
P. 891

23. Budgeting for planning and control

                    Leed Company
          Comparison of planned operating budget
          and actual results
          For quarter ended 2010 March 31
                                           Planned budget Actual
          Sales (budgeted 20,000 units, actual 19,000  $400,000  $380,000
          units)
          Cost of goods sold:
            Beginning finished goods inventory  $130,000  $130,000
            Cost of goods manufactured (25,000 units):
             Direct materials              $ 50,000     $ 62,500
             Direct labor                  150,000      143,750
             Variable manufacturing overhead  25,000    31,250
             Fixed manufacturing overhead  75,000       75,000
               Cost of goods manufactured  $300,000     $312,500
            Cost of goods available for sale  $430,000  $442,500
            Ending finished goods inventory  180,000    200,000
               Cost of goods sold          $250,000     $242,500
          Gross margin                     $150,000     $137,500
          Selling and administrative expenses:
            Variable                       $ 40,000     $ 28,500
            Fixed                          100,000      95,000
               Total selling and administrative expenses  $ 140,000  $123,500
          Income before income taxes       $ 10,000     $ 14,000
            Deduct: Estimated income taxes (40%)  4,000  5,600
          Net income                       $ 6,000      $ 8,400
            Exhibit 186: Leed Company: Comparison of planned operating budget and actual results
            In Exhibit 186 we compare the actual results with the planned operating budget. Comparison of actual results

          with the planned operating budget yields some useful information because it shows where actual performance
          deviated from planned performance. For example, sales were 1,000 units lower than expected, sales revenue was
          USD 20,000 less than expected, gross margin was USD 12,500 less than expected, and net income was USD 2,400
          more than expected.
            The comparison of actual results with the planned operating budget does not provide a basis for evaluating
          whether or not management performed efficiently at the actual level of operations. For example, in Exhibit 186, the
          cost of goods sold was USD 7,500 less than expected. The meaning of this difference is not clear, however, because

          the actual cost of goods sold relates to the 19,000 units actually sold, while the planned cost of goods sold relates to
          the 20,000 units expected.
            A company makes a valid analysis of expense controls by comparing actual results with a flexible operating
          budget based on the levels of sales and production that actually occurred. Exhibit 187 shows the comparison of
          Leed's flexible operating budget with the actual results. Note that the flexible budget in Exhibit 187 is made up of
          several pieces. The flexible budget amounts for sales revenue and selling and administrative expenses come from a
          flexible sales budget (not shown) for 19,000 units of sales.





















                                                           892
   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896