Page 114 - Towards A Sustainable Future 2024
P. 114

Affinity law: P2=P1 x(N2/N1)3    N1=1500rpm(before slippage)       1500rpm=120x50/p
            Slippage= 2%                           2/100 x1500=30
            P1/Old Power= 30kW               N2:120x40/4=1200rpm(before          P=120x50/1500
            P2/New Power= 15.36kW                    slippage)
            N1/Old Speed= 1470rpm                  2/100 x1200=24
            N2/New Speed= 1176rpm           P2=30x(1176/1470)^3=15.36kW
            Pole= 4
            Power Save= 14.64kW             Power Save: 30-15.36=14.64kW


            Power consumption based on solution                  Power comparison after the fan application (Daily, i.e.
                                                                 24Hrs)
            AHU power consumption: 15.36kW x 12 hours= 184.32kWh
            AHU power saved: 14.64kW x 24 hours= 175.68kWh       AHU (40Hz) + 4 Fan (12hrs) power consumption: 184.32kWh
            EuropAce Air Purifying Bladeless Fan (EBF Z3) x 4 power   + 1.68kWh= 186kWh
            consumption:
                                                                 Proposed Power Usage: 186kWh, 75.4602 KgCO2, 27,542.973
                                                                                                                 KgCO2  (annually)
                    35/1000  x 12 hours x 4 fans=1.68kWh
                                                                 Total Power Saved: 30kW x 12 hours= 360kWh(AHU’s VSD
            Indoor air quality at Basement 3 of the SGH One Campus,                                         frequency running at 50Hz)
            before and  after the implementation of the  eco-solution,
            is shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. Levels of power                                         360 – 186 = 174kWh, 70.5918 KgCO2,
            consumption, together with the equivalent power-related                                         25,766.007  KgCO2  (annually)
            CO2 emissions, are also indicated in each figure.





















                                              Figure 5:   Indoor air quality before implementation of eco solution

                                                              112
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119