Page 55 - Face2Face Uper Inter www.english0905.com
P. 55
www.english0905.com
Vocabulary back referencing
Dress code Skills Reading: a fashion article;
Listening: interviews about style
QUICK REVIEW Levels of certainty
about the future Think about your I
town/city. Predict what you think will/ ou' e label e
won't change in the next five years: I
The traffic is bound to get worse,
1
but they might ban cars from the he designer, Charles Frederick Worth (1825-95), was the first to sew labels
3
T into the clothes that he created. Because of this and his international
2
centre. Work in pairs. Compare your
fame, Worth is generally considered to be the father of fashion design, which
predictions.
4
started in the late 1 gth century. Before then, making clothes was mainly
5
done by anonymous dressmakers whose clothes were influenced
by what people were wearing at the French royal court. Worth,
6
originally from England, moved to France in 1846, where he enjoyed
Speaking, Reading and considerable success with the nobility. Since then, there have been
Vocabulary even greater successes for other designers, such as Chanel and Armani
7
and those appealing to the younger, trendier market, for example,
Work in pairs. Do you ever buy Tommy Hilfiger. Currently the fashion industry relies more on mass-
clothes and accessories with market sales than on exclusive designs. Some well-known designers
designer labels? Why?/Why not? have even teamed up with international high street shops who want to
8
add a luxury product to their range. For example, the London branch
Why do you think they are important
to so many people? of H&M, a clothing company from Stockholm, has started selling
cut-price clothes by high-fashion designers. Recently, hundreds of
people queued outside for up to 12 hours to buy clothes designed
a Read the article. Choose the best
11
1
9
by Lanvin! Some camped °there overnight, even though at
summary sentence for parts A and B.
the time England was experiencing an extremely cold winter. Is this
There are two sentences you do not
need. devotion to labelled goods really worth all the trouble?
www.english0905.com
1 There is evidence to suggest that An article in The Economist suggests labelled clothes really do
people buy designer labels to benefit the wearers. 1t quotes research from Tilburg University, in the
12
increase their status rather than Netherlands, which explains that such clothes bring status and even
14
13
because they particularly like them. job recommendations, but only when the label is visible! The university's
2 Designer clothes started for the rich first research experiment involved photos of a man wearing a polo shirt. The
15
but are now available in ordinary photos were digitally altered so that one shirt had no logo, another had a
shops. luxury-designer logo and 6the third had a non-luxury logo. On a five-point
1
3 Research confirms wearing designer scale for status, the luxury designer logo rated 3.5, no logo rated 2.91 and the
labels gives you advantages in life. non-luxury logo came last, rated 2.84. It seems it may be better to have no logo
4 Fashion designers are now mainly at all than to have the wrong logo! In another experiment, people watched one
17
targeting young people. of two videos of a job interview of the same man. In one, his shirt had a luxury
18
logo on it, in the other it didn't. The man with the logo was rated more suitable
b Read the article again. Answer for the job and even received a recommendation for a 9% higher salary! The
these questions. research concluded that like a peacock's tail, designer labels are seen as signs
1 How and where did designer of superior status: 'the peacock with the best tail gets all the girls'. But whereas
19
labels begin? a peacock can't fake his tail, it seems humans can fake their status by using
20
designer labels. And by doing so, the way we assess each other's status may
2 How did people react to designer
labels being sold at H&M? be seriously wrong!
3 What was the Tilburg University
research trying to find out?
4 What was the conclusion
of the research?
5 Why does the article refer
to peacocks?
c Work in pairs. Compare
answers. Then look at the
underlined sentences in the
article. Do you agree with
them? Why?/Why not?
••