Page 307 - V4
P. 307

Sefer Chafetz Chayim                                                                    םייח ץפח רפס
                                   Hilchot Esurei Rechilut                                                              תוליכר ירוסיא תוכלה
                                    Kelal Tet  -  Halachah 2                                                               ב הכלה -  ט ללכ


                              th
                                            th
                this sefer in the 7  Kelal, in the 30  notation of the Be’er Mayim Chayim                 ,םירחאמ עמש םא קר וליפא הזב יד הרואכלד ,הז
                using explicit proofs.  So too in our subject, if the speaker sees that his
                report will indirectly cause some type of loss to Plony, it is possible that              ךותמ  )א"ע  א"ס(  הדנב  ורמאש  הממ  רבדל  היארו
                conveying that report would be forbidden just as it would be forbidden if                 ,ןגרה ולאכ 'וכו חרק ןב ןנחוי תצעל שוחל ול היהש
                his report would directly result in a real loss to Plony, since it is possible
                that in disclosing his report word will spread and society will perceive this             ןינעכו :םש ל"זו אנידל הז רמאמ םש ש"ארה קיתעהו
                caretaker as being a thief or this potential partner as being disreputable, or            אובל לוכיש אכיה אשיב אנשילל שוחל שי אקוד הז
                something comparable, in all of the coming illustrative examples that we
                will bring with G-d’s help, and they will not find a source of livelihood;                אדבוע ךהכ ,ול שוחי אל םא םירחאל וא ול קזיה ידיל
                maybe what he heard about him was a lie.  From the commentary of the                      ןינע עמש םאד אמלא ,'וכו םקיחא ןב הילדגד יאהכו
                cited Rashbam we have no proof that would permit a leniency in this law
                (no leniency that would permit the gossip \ report) and this entire subject               ,םנזא תא הלגי אל םא םירחאל קזיה תויהל לוכיש
                requires much more thought and analysis.                                                  הצור הזש תרשמה וא ,הזל קיזהל הצור דחאש ןוגכ

                However, it is obvious to me that if this speaker is not familiar with this               ,ןמקלד םירויצה לכב הזב אצויכו ,בנג אוהש חקיל
                caretaker as being a thief (or something comparable in all of the coming
                examples), just that some people told him so, even if we hold that it is                  רוסיא תמחמ הז רבדב ןימאהל רוסא ןיד יפ לעד םגה
                permitted to tell Shimon so that he can take steps to protect himself, still              תולגל ךירצו ,יעבימ שוחל כ"פעא ,ר"השל תלבק
                he should not convey that report without any qualifications and give the
                impression that he knows what he is saying because he is implying that                             .ומצע תא רומשיש ידכ ונזא תא
                he was a first-hand witness.  What he should say is – “I heard from others
                such-and-such about Plony and it might be true, therefore you (Shimon)
                should suspect it is true and take steps to protect yourself.”  And having                'וכו ד"מו ה"ד )ב"ע ט"ל( ב"בב ם"בשרמ חכומ ןכו
                said this, you (the reader) will understand what I said at the beginning of               עמש אל םא וליפאד 'וכו אכהו ה"דבו 'וכו איה הוצמ
                the first illustrative example that follows at the end of this sefer, with G-d’s
                help, “that he recognizes him (Plony) and knows him very well (that he                    קר ,ןלזג אוהש קיזחמה לע ינולפ רמאש המ ומצעב
                is a thief).”                                                                             ןויכ ,קיזחמהל רפסל רתומ כ"ג ,ול ורפיס םירחאש
                And similarly in all of the coming illustrative examples ([he should warn                 ,ורטשב רהזיש ידכ קר תוליכר םשל אל ותנוכ רקיעד
                the future potential victim that Plony is a thief] with the exception of the              יאד ,ול ורמאיש םירחאל וא ם"בשרה ש"ממ אוהו
                examples of the “children’s tutor \ teacher” and the “bridegroom” both of
                which contain suggestions that these people (the tutor or the bridegroom)                 רפסל ןיאשר םירחא ויה אל יאדוב הז םעט םושמ ואל
                are  heretical,  G-d  forbid.    I  reviewed  and  changed  the  language  that  I        יאדו אלא ,ןלזג אוהש וילע ינולפ רמאש המ קיזחמהל
                used, and I used the expression “I heard... (meaning I only know of this
                because  someone  told  me)”  because  of  the  great  harm  that  commonly               ןימאהל םירוסא םמצעב םהד ףא יכהלו .ונבתכש ומכ
                occurs because of that kind of gossip), even if we say that it is permitted               ינולפ ךכ רמאש םהמ ועמשש םינשה ולאל הטלחהב
                to warn the victim by just hearing from others about Plony being a thief or
                something similar, and it is not necessary to know the situation personally               עשר םהמ דחא ךשפנ הממ כ"אד( ןלזג אוהש הז לע
                in order to warn the victim.  Yet because society is not careful in this                  וילע  איצוהש  ינולפ  וא  ,ןלזג  אוהש  הז  וא  ,יאדוב
                regard and people will repeat it back to the “victim” who is the subject of
                the gossip using language that expresses the gossip as a certainty because                ומכו ,ןניקזחמ אל יעישרב ישניא יקוזחאו ,םנחב זעל




        297                                                                                                                                                          292
      volume 4                                                                                                                                                    volume 4
   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312