Page 77 - VOL-2
P. 77

Mekor Hachayim                                 Sefer Chafetz Chayim
                                           Hilchot Esurei Lashon Hara

                                                           Kelal Vav

                    determine (4) if the remarks were true and then rebuke the victim
                    because of his actions. Perhaps in so doing he will be the cause
                    for the sinner to stop sinning or for the sinner to return the stolen
                    property to its owner or the sinner will mollify the victim who
                    was abused and insulted (or something comparable). In all these
                    instances it is permitted to listen to the remarks without forming
                    a definite personal opinion (and the reason is as I stated it above).
                    However, to believe the speaker’s Lashon Hara remarks as truth
                    would be forbidden in all circumstances (5).

                    K6/3. My dear reader, do not be astounded by this conclusion

                    of the law. (And if you would ask) if so, then how can a person
                    who is considering entering into a venture with another party fulfill
                    his obligation to the Torah (and not to listen to Lashon Hara) if
                    all avenues (of listening) have been closed and even passively
                    listening to the degradation of a fellow Jew is forbidden; perhaps
                    the information is relevant to me in the affairs of my business or
                    something else that is comparable. The answer is – Someone who
                    does want to fulfill his obligation to the Torah in this regard (of
                    hearing Lashon Hara and yet not violate any esur) should behave
                    as follows: - If someone comes up to you and wants to tell you
                    something about another Jew, and you understand (even before the
                    conversation gets started) that the speaker wants to denigrate a fellow
                    Jew, then you should pre-empt him by asking the following: “Is the
                    information you want to tell me relevant to me, either now or at
                    some time in the future or can I remedy this matter by rebuking this
                    fellow Jew (or something comparable)?” If the speaker responds
                    that the information is relevant to him or he tells him that he is in a
                    position to solve a problem, then it is permissible to listen to what
                    he has to say. However, even so, at that moment one is not allowed
                    to believe that what he is saying is truth. But one can suspect that
                    perhaps what he is saying is true until such time that the matter
                    becomes evident and the veracity of what he said is proven. But if
                    you understand from the speaker’s comments that nothing useful
                    can come from what he is saying or that his language is nothing but

                    65

                volume 2
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82