Page 20 - Aldi Lukman Nurhakim_How to Write Critical Esays: A Guide for Students of Literature
P. 20

Facing the question  19
             often be one which your reader already knows intimately. How
             you approach and assess even its most obvious features may be
             of interest to your tutor. The mere fact that these features exist
             will not. Description in a critical essay must initiate and
             contribute to debate. To ‘Describe’ is in fact to ‘Discuss’. To
             discuss intelligently is to be specific, to observe details, to
             identify the various parts which together determine a work’s
             overall impact. So you must ‘Analyse’ even where the title’s
             imperatives do not explicitly include that demand.
               Conversely, your being told merely to ‘Interpret’ a play or a
             novel would still require you to analyse the episodes into which
             it structures its story, the patterns by which it groups its
             personages, the distinct idioms through which it identifies their
             speech patterns and the recurring terms and images which
             compel all the characters to share its recognizably unified
             discourse. Interpretation must, of course, expose the ethical,
             religious or political value systems which a text implicitly
             reinforces or subverts. Yet these exist only in the architecture of
             its form and in the building materials of its language. What
             Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, for instance, is encouraging us to
             believe cannot be shown by a superficial summary of its plot.
             Such a summary might be almost identical with that of the
             original prose version of the story which Shakespeare found in
             North’s translation of Plutarch.
               Where Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar does subtly deviate from
             its source, it suppresses some of the basic narrative’s latent
             implications and foregrounds others. So interpretation of just
             how a particular work seeks to manipulate our definitions of
             what is true or desirable may also require you to make
             comparisons. You can hardly have sufficient sense of direction
             to know where one text is pushing you if your map of
             literature has no landmarks, and includes no texts which
             outline some alternative path. Thus, even where an essay title
             does not explicitly require you to approach one set text by
             reference to another, you are almost certain to find
             comparisons useful.
               ‘Compare’—even where it is not immediately followed by
             ‘and contrast’—does not mean that you should simply find the
             common ground between two texts. You must look for
             dissimilarities as well as similarities. The more shrewdly
             discriminating your reading of both texts has been, the more
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25