Page 22 - Aldi Lukman Nurhakim_How to Write Critical Esays: A Guide for Students of Literature
P. 22

Facing the question  21
             sufficiently well supported to be convincing, they must be seen
             to derive from observant analysis of the work’s components.
             They must also show sufficient knowledge of other texts to
             demonstrate by comparison exactly what about this one seems
             to you relatively impressive or unimpressive. So, too, they
             must be based on an energetic curiosity about the overall
             ideological pressure which a text exerts as the cumulative
             result of its more localized effects. You cannot decide whether
             to admire a text as an illuminating resource or to condemn it
             as a mystifying obstruction until you have worked out what
             ways of thinking it is trying to expand or contain. To evaluate,
             you must interpret.
               These interrelated concepts of evaluation and interpretation
             are, as the next section explains, more intriguingly
             problematical than some critics acknowledge.


             Some problems of value and meaning

             Can the values of a literary work be equally accessible to all its
             readers? Is a given meaning which interpretative criticism
             extracts likely to seem as meaningful to one reader as to
             another, and to remain unaffected by any difference in their
             respective situations? To take an admittedly extreme example,
             could a book about slavery—whether it supported or opposed
             that system—make such-equally convincing sense to both slaves
             and slave-owners that they would be able to agree on just how
             good a text it was?
               At least in those days when there was still major
             controversy over whether the slave trade should be eliminated,
             criticism ought presumably to have anticipated quite different
             responses to the same text. You might protest, however, that
             even then there were few slave-owners, and still fewer slaves,
             among those authors who contributed to the debate; or among
             the contemporary reviewers who evaluated their works; or
             among the readers for whom both authors and reviewers
             wrote. Literature at that time, you might argue, was in fact
             produced, processed and consumed by a class which had little
             direct experience of the business world that made its leisure
             possible. If that were your contention, you might usefully
             wonder about the relevance of literary values if they can be
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27