Page 59 - Aldi Lukman Nurhakim_How to Write Critical Esays: A Guide for Students of Literature
P. 59

58  How to write critical essays
             promisingly unfamiliar they may be, are sufficiently straight-
             forward to be explained briefly, and which are so marginally
             relevant that they merit only a sentence each? Which are so
             complex or controversial that they will need to be accompanied
             by a great deal of detailed evidence to make them clear and
             convincing?
               Some paragraphs might need to be reserved for principles.
             The premises which will only be implicit in more specific
             passages may need to be more openly debated and defended.
             On this Donne question, for instance, you might wish to gather
             together your thoughts about the difficulties of defining
             ‘religious’. Can this be done in a couple of sentences of the
             opening paragraph or will it need a whole paragraph to itself?
               Moreover, this set question about similarity of techniques
             may strike you as frustratingly tangential to the comparisons
             that you find most interesting between Donne’s secular and
             religious verse. You may need to allow space for arguing that
             the issues which seem to you more certainly important are in
             fact inseparable from those explicitly specified by the title.
               There is no right or wrong answer to the question of how
             many texts or topics should receive sustained treatment and
             how many must be discussed more briefly. The thoughtful critic
             is simply the one who sees the problem at the planning stage,
             and chooses a strategy which is defensible as the least of
             available evils.



             Paragraphing

             Each of your paragraphs must of course be centred on a
             particular issue which is raised by the set title. Each paragraph
             must be recognizable as a logical next step in a coherently
             developing argument that directly answers the set question.
             Nevertheless, in debating the value of including a particular
             paragraph, you should also ask yourself the following
             questions:
             1) Will this paragraph prove that I have read one or more
               specific texts which are demonstrably relevant?
             2) Will it show that I have read observantly? Will it contain
               specifics which only an attentive reader would have noticed?
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64