Page 61 - Aldi Lukman Nurhakim_How to Write Critical Esays: A Guide for Students of Literature
P. 61

60  How to write critical essays
             vocabulary and syntax that they should become a single
             paragraph labelled ‘simplicity’. Conversely you might now
             recognize that the material intended for paragraph 5 is in fact
             so thought provoking that it can usefully be expanded and
             divided into two paragraphs: one now labelled ‘concrete detail,
             lists of objects, descriptions of physical gestures and clothes’,
             and another summarized in ‘recurrent fascination with
             economic terms, literal calculations of cash in hand or in
             prospect and metaphorical use of “profit” and “loss” etc.’.
               Each paragraph must not only have a clearly identified topic.
             It must also advance at least one major idea. Check that you
             now understand—and will later, when writing your essay, be
             able to explain—the precise relevance of each paragraph. Ask
             not only ‘What is this paragraph to be about?’ but also ‘What
             am I going to say here and what will that prove in answer to
             the title’s specified question?’ Being clear about how each point
             supports your overall argument will often show you where it
             must be positioned for maximal effect.
               As you begin to make provisional decisions about which
             paragraphs belong together, check that in a pair which you
             intend to make adjacent each does make a clearly distinct point.
             Points may deserve separate paragraphs because they concern
             different, if related, issues:
             Paragraph (a): the portrayal of God in Paradise Lost
             Paragraph (b): the portrayal of Satan in Paradise Lost.

             These characters are active opponents in the work’s narrative
             structure and direct contrasts in its dramatized ideology. They
             are thus sufficiently distinct and yet so mutually defining as to
             deserve separate but adjacent paragraphs.
               Conflicting views of the same issue can deserve separate
             paragraphs too:
             Paragraph (a): the case against the text: it fails to make God
               impressive and Satan suspect
             Paragraph (b): the case for the text’s success in ensuring the
               reader’s respect for God and distaste for Satan
             Paragraph (c): the moments at which  Paradise Lost arguably
               succeeds because of, rather than in spite of, its failure to
               justify God and discredit Satan.
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66