Page 65 - Aldi Lukman Nurhakim_How to Write Critical Esays: A Guide for Students of Literature
P. 65

64  How to write critical essays
             characterization, style, plot, scene and setting, theme and
             stance, considering examples of each issue through a number
             of novels. Here, too, thesis and antithesis could shape various
             sections. One section might first discuss Dickens’s most
             committedly amusing characters or the funnier components in
             his more ambiguous portraits. This evidence could then be
             balanced by characterization which seems designed to evoke
             poignancy or to articulate protest. A subsequent section could
             explore the verbal devices which are closest to casual,
             localized jokes and then those which contribute to a more
             sustained and thoughtful portrait of individual experience or
             social pressure.
               If you are weighing so many controversial issues, the desir-
             ability of regular attempts at synthesis is uncertain. To follow
             the pros and cons in each case with a summary which merely
             reiterates some already established balance is useless. Do not
             indulge in: ‘Thus it can be seen that sometimes Dickens chooses
             a setting because of its potential for humour and sometimes
             because landscape or architecture can be used for serious,
             symbolic purposes.’ Such a method will merely impose a whole
             series of flaccidly vague conclusions throughout your essay. The
             final paragraph’s inherent risk of imposing just one is quite
             sufficient.
               But there may be ways here, too, of relating previously
             opposed views in some less obviously polarized way. For
             instance, a simple contrast between entertainingly hyperbolic
             caricatures and touchingly credible characters might be
             followed by a consideration of the way in which the plot
             compels the two groups to interact. You might wish to argue
             that the text often makes us laugh at the muddled way in which
             people speak only so that we are alerted to the dangerously
             confused definitions upon which they will act.
               A merely summarizing synthesis is not worth a sentence. You
             should rely upon your detailed arguments to have implicitly
             made clear where the balance of probability lies. But a
             complicating synthesis which establishes some new relationship
             between thesis and antithesis can maintain progress and may be
             worth a whole paragraph.
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70