Page 46 - TPA Journal January - February 2019
P. 46

so long as they have probable cause to do so.        enclosed top portion of the driveway that abuts the
                                                             house.
        Like the automobile exception,  the Fourth
        Amendment’s protection of curtilage has long         The “ ‘conception defining the curtilage’ is . . .
        been black letter law. “[W]hen it comes to the       familiar enough that it is ‘easily understood from
        Fourth Amendment, the home is first among            our daily experience.’ ” Just like the front porch,
        equals.” “At the Amendment’s ‘very core’ stands      side garden, or area “outside the front window,”
        ‘the right of a man to retreat into his own home     the driveway enclosure where Officer Rhodes
        and there be free from unreasonable governmental     searched the motorcycle constitutes “an area
        intrusion.’ ”  To give full practical effect to that  adjacent to the home and ‘to which the activity of
        right, the Court considers curtilage—“the area       home life extends,’ ” and so is properly considered
        ‘immediately surrounding and associated with the     curtilage.
        home’ ”—to be “ ‘part of the home itself
                                                             In physically intruding on the curtilage of Collins’
        for Fourth Amendment purposes.’ ”           “The
                                                             home to search the motorcycle, Officer Rhodes
        protection afforded the curtilage is essentially a
                                                             not    only     invaded      Collins’    Fourth
        protection of families and personal privacy in an
                                                             Amendment interest in the item searched, i.e., the
        area intimately linked to the home, both physically
                                                             motorcycle, but also invaded Collins’ Fourth
        and psychologically, where privacy expectations
                                                             Amendment interest in the curtilage of his home.
        are most heightened.”
                                                             The question before the Court is whether the
        When a law enforcement officer physically            automobile exception justifies the invasion of the
        intrudes on the curtilage to gather evidence, a      curtilage.2 The answer is no.
        search within the meaning of the  Fourth
                                                             Applying the relevant legal principles to a slightly
        Amendment has occurred.  Such conduct thus is
                                                             different factual scenario confirms that this is an
        presumptively unreasonable absent a warrant.
                                                             easy case. Imagine a motorcycle parked inside the
        With this background in mind, we turn to the         living room of a house, visible through a window
        application of these doctrines in the instant case.  to a passerby on the street. Imagine further that an
        As an initial matter, we decide whether the part of  officer has probable cause to believe that the
        the driveway where Collins’ motorcycle was           motorcycle was involved in a traffic infraction.
        parked and subsequently searched is curtilage.       Can the officer, acting without a warrant, enter the
                                                             house to search the motorcycle and confirm
        According to photographs in the record, the
                                                             whether it is the right one? Surely not.
        driveway runs alongside the front lawn and up a
        few yards past the front perimeter of the house.     The reason is that the scope of the automobile
        The top portion of the driveway that sits behind     exception extends no further than the automobile
        the front perimeter of the house is enclosed on two  itself. Virginia asks the Court to expand the scope
        sides by a brick wall about the height of a car and  of the automobile exception to permit police to
        on a third side by the house. A side door provides   invade any space outside an automobile even if
        direct access between this partially enclosed        the  Fourth Amendment protects that space.
        section of the driveway and the house. A visitor     Nothing in our case law, however, suggests that
        endeavoring to reach the front door of the house     the automobile exception gives an officer the right
        would have to walk partway up the driveway, but      to enter a home or its curtilage to access a vehicle
        would turn off before entering the enclosure and     without a warrant. Expanding the scope of the
        instead proceed up a set of steps leading to the     automobile exception in this way would both
        front porch.  When Officer Rhodes searched the       undervalue the core Fourth Amendment protection
        motorcycle, it was parked inside this partially      afforded to the home and its curtilage and


        42                www.texaspoliceassociation.com  •  866-997-8282              Texas Police Journal
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51