Page 83 - Farm Bill Series_The 7 Things You Should Know
P. 83

GOP primary in 2016. The conservative House Freedom Caucus is still around, but the group has
               so far been consumed by the debate over what to do with the Affordable Care Act. Freedom
               Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows, R-N.C., told Agri-Pulse recently he hadn't even thought about
               the farm bill and SNAP.

               President Trump’s campaign advisers distanced themselves from the GOP platform language.
               During an October debate with a surrogate for Hillary Clinton, Trump campaign co-chair Sam
               Clovis said that nutrition programs should stay in the farm bill and that the best way to
               reduce the cost of SNAP is to promote economic growth that will put more people to work.

               A few farm lobbyists wonder privately whether the farm-food coalition is as relevant as it used to
               be. SNAP can be routinely extended through appropriations measures. If all a farm bill is going
               to do is cut the program, there would seem to be less reason for Democrats to support the
               legislation.



               But farm and anti-hunger groups say they’re determined to keep their coalition intact, as shown
               by last month’s letter to the congressional Budget committees. “The agricultural community as a
               whole has little interest in slogging through another farm bill debate without working closely
               with our colleagues in the nutrition community,” said Chuck Conner, a deputy agriculture
               secretary under George W. Bush who is now president and CEO of the National Council of
               Farmer Cooperatives.

               Conaway, the House Agriculture Committee chairman, plans to move a new farm bill late this
               year or in early 2018, but he’s not sure how extensively Speaker Ryan wants to address SNAP
               and other welfare programs, or when. And it’s not clear that whatever Ryan decides to do would
               have legs. Unlike in 1996, there’s little interest in the Senate for welfare reform, says Roberts,
               the Senate Agriculture chairman.

               O’Conner, the former House Agriculture Committee aide who is now a farm policy consultant
               with McLeod, Watkinson and Miller, said the public support for welfare reform that existed in
               the early 1990s is not there now. “Even the ferment about food stamps that was going during the
               last farm bill did not produce results that would tell you that it’s an absolute priority,” he said.

               When asked about Ryan’s plans for welfare reform, a spokeswoman responded, “We haven’t
               said anything publicly.” A report issued by Ryan last year called for identifying policies that
               discourage work-capable SNAP recipients from getting jobs or preparing for employment.

               Conaway, meanwhile, faces essentially the same balancing act that Lucas did in finding enough
               support to get a farm bill through the House. His committee held 16 hearings on SNAP in 2015
               and 2016 and issued a report in December last year with a series of relatively modest
               recommendations. Among its conclusions: Some states need to better enforce their work
               requirements and enforcement needs to be coupled with better employment and training
               programs. “Promoting pathways to employment is the best way to help individuals climb
               the economic ladder out of poverty and into self-sufficiency,” the report said.





                                                     www.Agri-Pulse.com                                                                    81
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88