Page 144 - THE SLOUGHI REVIEW - ISSUE 13
P. 144

T H E   S L O U G H I   R E V I E W                                                                   1 4 4




         The concept of eugenics is ancient in origin. The term “eu-geniko”, means “well-born”, of
         good descent (eu = good, genos = descent, gender, clan); Plato proposed around 400 BC
         to improve the marriage initiation among the upper classes by certain rules to ensure the
         continuation of the social order [92].


         The early proponents of eugenics in the 19th century, such as David J. Galton, saw it as a
         way of improving groups of people. More specifically, groups of people from the upper

         strata of society. This selection is based on a biographically characterised origin. In
         today's usage, the term eugenics is closely associated with scientific racism. Modern
         bioethicists who advocate a new eugenics refer to it as a method of improving individual
         characteristics, regardless of group membership.



         The idea for a modern project to improve the human population through selective
         breeding was originally developed by Francis Galton and was originally inspired by
         Darwinism and his theory of natural selection. Galton had read his half-cousin Charles
         Darwin's theory of evolution to explain the development of plant and animal species and
         wanted to apply it to humans. Based on his biographical studies, Galton believed that
         desirable human characteristics were heritable. Darwin, however, strictly disagreed
         with this interpretation and elaboration of his theory [93].



         So we see from this example that Darwin assumed natural selection, but did not, like his
         half-cousin Galton, accept artificial selection according to the specific ideas of
         individuals. This is where a modern breeding idea must start!


         Even if humans intervene here, it is only to prevent the mating of dissimilar types. In the

         case of the Sloughis, however, the sedentary people also mate their Sloughis with those of
         the nomads, so that a broad genetic base is created.


         However, as we have already explained, the origins of, for example, the Sloughi and Saluki
         dog types are to be assessed differently, as the Honourable Florence Amherst and others
         have already justified.



         Peter Müller tells of the Inuit that they reproduce their Huskies genetically broadly by
         bringing the bitch in heat together with several tethered males, so that the bitch can
         make her own choice. According to Cuvier, however, this is the definition of a species,
         i.e. a natural reproductive community with free choice of mate.
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149