Page 116 - Binder2
P. 116

This specificity is what makes Tregs so powerful in the
               context of biologics.

               The result?
               A biologic that the immune system learns to ignore, but
               without compromising its ability to respond to pathogens or
               tumors.

               That’s the holy grail: targeted tolerance.

               And yet, most biologic drug designs do nothing to engage
               this pathway. They don’t stimulate Tregs. They don’t
               mimic the context in which Tregs are induced. In fact, by
               delivering drugs in ways the immune system interprets as
               danger signals, they often suppress Treg development
               entirely, or even provoke the exact effector T cells that
               neutralize the therapy.

               This is not inevitable.
               It’s avoidable—if we build biologics that cooperate with
               Tregs instead of ignoring them.

               Because in the long arc of immune memory, a Treg is far
               more powerful than any suppressive co-therapy.
               It’s not a Band-Aid. It’s a rewiring of perception.

               And if biologics are ever going to become durable
               therapies—measured in years, not quarters—then Tregs
               aren’t optional. They’re essential.

               This isn’t just a quirk of gut biology. It’s an evolutionary
               adaptation. A way to prevent the immune system from
               overreacting to food, commensals, and self.


               And it’s exactly the pathway we should be engaging when
               introducing complex biologics.

                                          114
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121