Page 352 - Binder2
P. 352

The Power of the Undefined


               In the absence of clear regulatory frameworks, everything
               remains negotiable:


                   ●  How clinical trials should be structured.
                   ●  What endpoints are required.
                   ●  Whether plant-derived proteins must meet the same
                       sterility standards as injected ones.
                   ●  Whether a dried lettuce capsule qualifies as a
                       biologic, a drug, a supplement, or some new hybrid.

               This lack of clarity creates a chilling effect on capital
               investment and internal prioritization. Even if a company
               sees the potential, it can justify deprioritizing edible
               biologics simply because the rules don’t yet exist.


               But once the rules are written—once the FDA approves a
               plant-made oral biologic with clear guidance—the clock
               starts ticking. Then, large players will no longer be able to
               hide behind ambiguity. They’ll need to compete.

               And they know it.




               Strategic Inertia Disguised as Regulatory
               Prudence


               In this way, regulatory ambiguity becomes strategic
               inertia—not just tolerated by incumbents, but quietly
               welcomed. It allows companies to:

                   ●  Appear supportive of innovation without actually
                       advancing it.


                                          350
   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357