Page 55 - Binder2
P. 55

By the 1980s and 1990s, the pharmaceutical frontier had
               shifted. As genomics and molecular biology exploded, a
               new class of diseases—autoimmune conditions, cancers,
               rare genetic disorders—called for more sophisticated tools.
               That’s when biologics entered the scene.

               These weren’t pills. They were living therapies:
               monoclonal antibodies, recombinant proteins, fusion
               molecules, enzymes, hormones. They were too large and
               complex to be made in a lab dish—so we turned to cell
               factories. CHO cells. Yeast. Bacteria. Eventually plants.
               These living systems were engineered to produce intricate
               proteins that could be used as medicine.


               Biologics were a triumph of molecular engineering. They
               could block specific cytokines, target rogue B-cells, replace
               defective enzymes, and slow the immune system with a
               level of precision that small molecules couldn’t match. For
               patients with diseases like Crohn’s, rheumatoid arthritis,
               multiple sclerosis, and dozens of rare disorders, they were
               nothing short of transformational.

               And for the pharmaceutical industry, they were a gold
               rush.


               Drugs like Remicade, Enbrel, and Humira didn’t just treat
               diseases—they redefined entire markets. By the early
               2000s, biologics accounted for a growing share of top-
               selling therapies worldwide. Their complexity justified
               their price. Their novelty justified their hype.

               But with all this innovation came a quiet tradeoff: we were
               designing these therapies to work, but not necessarily to
               last.

                                           53
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60