Page 36 - EW-June-2025
P. 36

Cover Story










         PRIVATE SCHOOL FEES
         BEWARE GOVERNMENT





         REGULATION TROJAN HORSE








         Collective bargaining by school-specific parents associations
         is a better option than inviting government fees regulation.
         India’s weak national development experience proves that
         inviting government intervention is to invite a sea of troubles





         Dilip Thakore



         E                DUCATION OF INDIA’S 260 MILLION   of writing, according to reliable sources, the all-important



                                                          school-specific committee will comprise six school repre-
                          child population simultaneously
                          represents  a  national  priority  and
                                                          sentatives (including principal and three teachers), five
                                                          parents/guardians (selected by draw, with representation
                          business opportunity. Yet because of
                          muddled policy formulation, neither
                                                          for women and reserved categories), and a nominee of the
                          of  these  socially  beneficial  impera-
                                                          parameters for fees determination, including the school’s
                          tives are being realised. Learning
                                                          location, infrastructure, education standard, operating ex-
                          outcomes of 150 million children in 1   DoE (Department of Education). The Bill details specific
         million government schools are rock bottom, and manage-  penses, and surplus revenue. Schools charging more than
         ments of 450,000 private schools which host an estimated   the fees set by the school-specific committee will be liable
         110 million children are harassed by continuous (state) gov-  to penalties ranging from Rs.1-10 lakh. The draft Bill also
         ernment education ministry bureaucrats, inspectors and   prohibits coercive action against students — such as expul-
         also middle class parents on the issue of school fees.   sion or withholding results — for non-payment of fees.
            On April 29, shortly after the BJP/NDA coalition swept   However even as the new Bill is pending debate and en-
         the Delhi state legislative election ending the two-term in-  actment in the Delhi state legislative assembly, on May 9,
         cumbency of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), the new gov-  the Delhi Public School (DPS), Dwarka (Delhi), expelled 32
         ernment headed by chief minister Rekha Gupta approved   students for non-payment of tuition fees. Last July (2024)
         a draft Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation   when the school — promoted by the DPS Society (estb.1949)
         and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025. The Bill proposes es-  which manages a chain of 231 owned and franchised DPS
         tablishment of a three-tier structure — school-specific fees   schools in India and abroad — increased its fee by a re-
         committees, district fee appellate committees and revision   ported 36 percent, the National Commission for Protection
         committees — to approve and regulate private school fees   of Child Rights (NCPCR) filed a criminal case against DPS,
         and address parents’ grievances.                 Dwarka under several provisions of the Juvenile Justice
            Although the draft has not been made public at time   Act, 2015. Even as investigations were being conducted,

         36    EDUCATIONWORLD   JUNE 2025
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41