Page 18 - March EW PDF 24
P. 18

Editorial



         REAFFIRMATION OF JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE                            states has received more than half of
                                                                           the value of bonds issued by SBI. BJP
                                                                           received Rs.6,565 crore via bonds be-
              here was always a bad smell about   ance  of  complete  confidentiality  to   tween 2017 and 2023 while the Con-
              the electoral bonds scheme   purchasers, they could be gifted to   gress — the country’s major opposi-
         T(EBS) introduced by the ruling   registered political parties of choice.   tion party — Rs.1,123 crore.
         BJP government in the Union Budget   An earlier provision in Representation   In the circumstances, the Supreme
         2017-18 as a Money Bill (exempt from   of People Act, 1951, which restricted   Court held the electoral bonds scheme
         approval by the Rajya Sabha). The   corporate donations to 7.5 percent   was violative of citizens’ fundamental
         unanimous judgement of a five-judge   of net profit, was abolished enabling   rights under Article 19 (1) (a) which
         bench of the Supreme Court delivered   even loss-making corporates to pur-  includes the right to information de-
         on February 15, striking it down as un-  chase electoral bonds.   nied by the confidentiality/anonymity
         constitutional is reassuring because it   Self-evidently, this unrestricted   provision of EBS. “Information about
         contradicts widespread belief that the   freedom given to corporate manage-  funding of political parties is essential
         country’s autonomous institutions in-  ments would be detrimental to the in-  for the effective exercise of the choice
         cluding the media and judiciary, are   terest of their shareholders and would   of voting,” said Chief Justice DY Chan-
         buckling under government pressure.   not be exercised without a compelling   drachud in his ruling. The judges held
           It’s unsurprising that the Supreme   quid pro quo. Similarly, a ceiling of   that citizens’ right to information was
         Court has struck down the EBS be-  Rs.20,000 imposed on anonymous   of greater import than of the right to
         cause it was patently in favour of the   individual donations was dispensed   privacy of political parties’ donors.
         ruling party at the Centre and states   with under the new legislation, open-  However, it’s doubtful if this judge-
         and heavily weighted against opposi-  ing the possibility of corporates and   ment will serve the purpose of inform-
         tion parties. Under EBS provisions,   wealthy individuals, assured of confi-  ing the public about the funding of po-
         corporations and individuals were   dentiality, heavily influencing the rul-  litical parties. At best, it will restore
         permitted to purchase electoral bonds   ing party to formulate donor-friendly   the status quo ante and funding of
         with a face value of Rs.1,000 to Rs.1   legislation or policies. And so it has   political parties will be driven under-
         crore by cheque or through digital   proved. According to data published   ground, necessitating generation of
         channels — during short time win-  by the Election Commission of India,   vast amounts of unaccounted ‘black’
         dows — from the public sector State   in the  seven-year  period  since  the   money. Its major takeaway is that it
         Bank of India. Designed as bearer   Electoral Bonds Act became law, the   has reaffirmed independence of the
         bond promissory notes with assur-  BJP ruling at the Centre and in several   judiciary.

         BULLDOZER JUSTICE & ESTOPPEL DOCTRINE                             consideration for bribes and issuance
                                                                           of false documents. Years later after
                                                                           conniving  officials  are  transferred,
              he midnight demolition of min-  the national capital stating that to-  new sets of officials continue to extract
              er Wakeel Hassan’s home in   morrow “someone might buy India   rents and fees to look the other way
         TDelhi by bulldozers of the Delhi   Gate and construct a home there”. The   until it is no longer possible to do so.
         Development Authority (DDA) has   justices refused to issue a stay against   That’s when bulldozers get to work.
         again highlighted the contempt and   official demolition — in the style of   In the circumstances, it’s high time
         cruelty with which government and   Hassan’s home — of unauthorised   the courts took judicial notice of cor-
         its agencies interact with bottom-of-  constructions in Dwarka and several   ruption and bribery that is rife in the
         -pyramid citizens. Hassan attained   other areas of Delhi. Curiously, the   DDA and municipal corporations. In
         national fame last November when   learned judges overlooked the fact   this particular case, the courts should
         he led a team of 12 self-trained ‘rat-  that in many, if not most, of these   enquire why the DDA did not object
         hole’ miners (who venture down nar-  cases,  the  homes  were  constructed   to Hassan’s prolonged adverse pos-
         row underground passages to extract   on government/DDA land years, and   session of DDA land and whimsically
         coal from open cast mines) to rescue   often decades ago. For instance, Has-  decided to demolish his painstakingly
         41 engineers trapped in a collapsed   san’s home was constructed 13 years   financed home this year.
         road construction tunnel in Silkyara,   ago, according to his wife Shabana.  Laws of natural justice mandate
         Uttarkashi, after all efforts including   In the circumstances, the question   that land owners should protest ad-
         import of sophisticated earth-boring   arises: What was DDA doing all these   verse possession as soon as it occurs.
         machines from the US, failed. Yet on   years? More pertinently, didn’t the au-  In particular, government authorities
         February 28, without any notice, Has-  thority have a duty of care to nip the   that don’t dispute adverse possession
         san’s home in Delhi’s Khajoori Khas   encroachment of its land in the bud?   within reasonable time, should be for-
         area was demolished by DDA officials   Their lordships seem unaware. It’s   bidden to interfere with the peaceful
         on the ground that it had been illegally   common practice nationwide for ubiq-  possession of ‘illegal’ occupiers under
         constructed on DDA land.         uitous touts and middlemen hand-in-  the well-established law of estoppel.
           A day after this Silkyara hero’s   glove with corrupt municipal govern-  There’s a lot that’s rotten within civic
         home was razed, a Delhi high court   ment/  DDA  officials  to  encourage   and municipal governments country-
         bench expressed indignation about   under-educated citizens like Hassan   wide. The judiciary should condemn
         the spread of illegal constructions in   to erect homes on government land in   rather than condone it.

         18    EDUCATIONWORLD   MARCH 2024
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23