Page 403 - 20818_park-B_efi
P. 403

1. A patient told his psychiatrist about robberies he had committed.   permitted to tell a gentile mailman outside of Eretz Yisarel on Shabbos
 The physician has begun therapy and hopes to see positive results. Is   that one cannot open a letter delivered on Shabbos. If the mailman
 he obligated to notify the police about this man’s activities?  understands the hint, he will open the letter for him on  Shabbos.
 2. A patient abroad revealed to his physician that he had killed his   This requires clarification, because it involves a violation of a possi-
 Jewish friend. He made a condition with the physician that he not   ble Biblical prohibition. The Pri Megadim answers that it’s possible
 reveal this secret to anyone in the world. Is the physician obligated to   that the letter contains a matter of pikuach nefesh, and therefore it is
 reveal this to the authorities?  permissible to hint to the mailman to open it. Likewise in our case,
           perhaps we can say that Shimon destroyed letters that possibly con-
           tained matters of pikuach nefesh, and therefore it is permissible to fire
 1   AnsweR to Question 3  him on the basis of only one witness. Maybe it is also permitted to
           cause the postmaster to sin once, instead of allowing Shimon to sin
 We will first rule on the last question: Is the physician obligated to
 tell the authorities that the patient killed his friend, a Jew? In ma-  many times.
 seches Niddah (61a), it says that there was a rumor spread that some   If there is a condition in the contract that says that a mailman
 people of the Galilee had killed a person. These people asked Rabbi   can be fired even on the grounds of a suspicion without substantive
 Tarfon to hide them, and he responded that since perhaps they had   proof, then one should tell on him without any hesitation. He is even
 murdered, he was not permitted to save them (Rashi). Therefore, he   obligated to tell on him in order to prevent harm to the public and to
 said, go and hide.  prevent Shimon from the opportunity to continue stealing from the
           public.
 The  Rosh  questions  Rashi’s  interpretation  of the  Gemara  (ibid.,
 9:5). Based on a rumor that a person sinned, is it prohibited to save   
 him? The Rosh explains, as does Tosfos, (s.v. atmarinchu, in the name   Now we can answer the second question we posed at the beginning.
 of Sheiltos) that Rabbi Tarfon was concerned that if they had actually   Should one expose the allegations against the school-director at the
 murdered, and he would hide them, the king would kill him. That is   expense of harming his patient’s family?
 why he refused to hide them. The Maharsha further explains that even   The Nodah Biyehudah ruled on a similar case (first edition #35).
 at a time when capital crimes are no longer judged, it is still prohib-  There was a man who sinned for many years with a married woman
 ited to rescue murderers. We are to allow them to perish along with   and then wanted to repent. He asked if he was obligated to tell the
 all the wicked people in the world. The reason Rabbi Tarfon would   woman’s husband, who would then have to divorce her if he accepted
 have seemingly saved them if not for fear of his own life is because of   the confession as fact, causing great shame to the family? Perhaps, he
 the principle that possible danger to life is ruled on leniently, and also   asked, this is like the case of someone who sees his fellowman un-
 that all people are presumed to be innocent, so we assume they did   knowingly wearing sha’atnez (a forbidden mixture of wool and linen)
 not kill. But if it is clear that someone is a murderer, one should not   in public. The din is that he does not notify him, so that he will not
 save him. (See Chafetz Chaim, Hilchos Lashon Hara 6:28).  have to undress in the marketplace, because of the importance of kev-
 It says in the Sefer Meshaneh Halachos (Part 7 #285):  od habriyos (respectability). Similarly, perhaps it would be preferable
           not to tell the man anything at all.
 Although Rashi and Tosfos and Rosh disagree about wheth-  The Noda Biyehudah answered that one is obligated to tell the hus-
 er or not to save him, they certainly do not say that one   band. This is different from sha’atnez, which is only a temporary sin.




 384   1  Medical-HalacHic Responsa of Rav ZilbeRstein  Patient reveals sins  2   397                                                                         #                                                                                    20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 13 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:29:05 | SR:-- | Cyan   20818_efi-ab







































































                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          # 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 13 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:29:05 | SR:
   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408