Page 4 - DIFDUF
P. 4

667
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             better patient services and health outcomes and will lower the
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             are patients and their families, at the planning stage will lead to
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             recognizing that presenting the service to the recipients, who
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             patient involvement in research and the healthcare system,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Israel Endocrine Society, highlighted the importance of more
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Chairman of the conference, Prof. Avi Karasik, president of the
                                                                                                             A mean PPV of 17.8% is higher than the predictive values
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             pATIEnT InVOlVEMEnT: RESEARCH AnD THE HEAlTHCARE SySTEM
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             occur in other countries or in Israel.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             ties regarding the design of services and policy changes, which
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             the healthcare system. Participants presented specific activi-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             focused on patient involvement in various processes within
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             from transverse health systems attended the conference, which
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Care Initiative. Clinicians, healthcare providers, and patients
                                                                                                                                                                                                                           The conference was organized by the OTZMA Diabetes
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             care systems [2].
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             and active also within the policy-making processes in health-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             result, patients and their families are becoming more involved
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             and healthcare provider in determining a treatment plan. As a
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             approach in which there is a partnership between the patient
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             treatment approaches to disease, to a more patient-centered
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             archal conception, in which the healthcare provider dictates
                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Over the last 2 decades healthcare has gone from a patri-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             in the design and policy in healthcare [1].
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             raise awareness of the expanding trend of patient involvement
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Israel, on 21 March 2018. The focus of the conference was to
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             T cation in Diabetes was held at the Daniel Hotel in Herzliya,
                                                                                                             Based on trigger frequency and their PPVs, a consensus
                                                                                                                                                                                                                           he 4th Annual Conference on Therapeutic Patient Edu-

                     1
                2.70%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              patient advocacy, patient involvement
                     19
                19.0%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Diabetes, diabetes education program, healthcare policy,
                     2
                15.38%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              4th Annual Conference on Therapeutic Patient Education in
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        KEY WORDS:
                     5
                38.46%
                     10
                17.54%
                     1
                11.11%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        131118-COHANIM - 131118-COHANIM | 1 - A | 18-11-13 | 11:24:13 | SR:-- | Cyan
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        #131118-COHANIM - 131118-COHANIM | 1 - A | 18-11-13 | 11:24:13 | SR:-- | Black
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        131118-COHANIM - 131118-COHANIM | 1 - A | 18-11-13 | 11:24:13 | SR:-- | Yellow
                     3
                42.86%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        131118-COHANIM - 131118-COHANIM | 1 - A | 18-11-13 | 11:24:13 | SR:-- | Magenta
                     0
                                                                                                             The most common triggers involved prescribing antiemetics
                N/A
                     0
                N/A
                     5
                41.67%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  1
                     4
                16.67%
                     1
                12.5%
                     13
                11.61%
                     4
                36.36%
                                                                                                             Overall, 1.54 ADEs were found for every 100 days of hos-
                     7
                50%
                predictive value
                     found
                     ADEs
                positive
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        #
       Original articles   37  100  13  13  57  9  7  1  3  12  24  8  112  11  14  found  Triggers   < 0.001  < 0.001  0.465*  0.009  0.009  –  P value  Original articles  ≤ 50,000mm 3 , 1 (50)  T13: Thrombocytopenia    ≤ 3000/mm 3 , 1 (50)  T12: Leukopenia    None  None  creatinine, 6 (24)  T15: Rise in serum   medication, 8 (32)  T18: Abrupt cessation of   administration, 7 (14)  T1: Antihistamine   medication, 11 (22)  T18: Abrupt cessation of   administrations, 13 (2
                   Furthermore, compared to other ADE reporting systems,   the authors of this study). Study personnel underwent train-  Richards also stated that the research ecosystem is prepared to   Administration of the Ministry of Health, initiated a meet-
                   the Trigger Tool was shown to assist in identifying 10 times   ing to allow for standardization and optimize reproducibility   consider clinical research papers only if the authors can dem-  ing with the public to investigate the gap between extensive
                   more ADEs in approximately one-third of all hospitalizations.   in data collection. Identified ADEs were further classified by   onstrate a partnership with the patients in their study. Finally,   knowledge and advanced technologies compared to the
                   However, between-country differences in medical practices   the severity of the ADE and the nature of the condition (e.g.,   Richards presented the role of patients on the editorial board,   achievements of the Israeli healthcare system in these fields.
                   were shown to affect the Trigger Tool sensitivity and its positive   rash, hematologic event, neurologic event). In addition, each   editorial staff, and journal events and campaigns. She noted that   This gap is reflected in the rising rate of those presenting with
                   predictive value (PPV). The latter has been reported to range   event was classified as preventable or non-preventable based   specific challenges included editorial collaboration, the need for   chronic illness who have difficulty adhering to treatment and
                   between 4.0% and 21.5% in Britain and Belgium, respectively   on the researcher’s clinical judgment. All disagreements in the   patient guidance and support, and the value of considering the   therefore endure unnecessary health deterioration and hos-
                   [16,17]. This finding is further reflected by variance in ADE   classification of type, severity, or preventability were resolved by   actions of patients, caregivers, and advocates.   pitalization. The basis for this initiative is to understand that
                   prevalence of 3.4% in Britain and 15.6% in Brazil [17,19]. Given   consensus. To prevent potential conflicts of interest, physicians   In Israel, the medical field is seeing the first signs of activity   the public has the knowledge and experience to approach
                   the relatively low PPV in the British study, along with an esti-  were appointed to review charts that were not from the hospital   and involvement from patients and their families within policy   chronic disease treatment. The main theme that emerged
                   mated 40% sensitivity for preventable ADEs, the Trigger Tool   at which they work.                            making processes, research initiatives, and healthcare education   from this process was that both patients and healthcare pro-
                   was not adopted in British hospitals.             Apart from looking for trigger-related ADEs, research       programs.                                       viders need better ongoing communication based on trust,
                     In Israel, the evidence is scant with estimated ADE rates   nurses registered other ADEs identified through chart reviews                                   transparency, and partnership.
                   of 25% and 32% in 1997 and 1998, respectively [20,21]. The   in an attempt to identify ADEs not captured by the Trigger   pATIEnT InVOlVEMEnT: DEVElOpMEnT Of RESEARCH AnD EVAlu-
                   objective of the present study was to validate the Trigger Tool   Tool. Furthermore, in each of the four hospitals, we reviewed   ATIOn TOOlS                 pATIEnT InVOlVEMEnT: ADVOCACy ORgAnIzATIOnS
                   in Israel and to define the ADE rates in four different hospitals.   the patient safety reporting systems for any ADEs reported by   Prof. Orly Manor, chairman of the board of the Israel National   Giora Sherf, the general manager of the chronic myeloid
                                                                   the staff during the study period, specifically those related to   Institute for Health Policy Research, and former head of the   leukemia (CML) patient organization (a non-governmental
                                                                   the patients included in our study.                           Israel National Program for Quality Measures in Community   organization), presented the patient’s perspective. Sherf rep-
                   PATIENTS AND METHODS                                                                                          Healthcare, presented the growing role of patients in developing   resented patient advocacy groups and spoke about local and
                   STuDy pOpulATIOn AnD SETTIng                    SAMplE SIzE AnD STATISTICAl AnAlySIS                          research and evaluation tools, as it is reflected in the develop-  international initiatives that are led by patients presenting with
                   The study was a retrospective descriptive correlative analysis   Sample size was determined by the Trigger Tool official guide-  ment of quality indicators and Patient-Reported Outcome   CML and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). One of the
                   surveying four general hospitals in Israel located in different   lines. This design required the inclusion of 20 charts per month   Measures (PROMs) [7,8]. The National Program for Quality   patient-driven initiatives [9] is one of the most comprehensive
                   geographical regions. All four hospitals are public academic   for the 1 year study. Accordingly, 240 charts were randomly   Measures in Community Healthcare, in cooperation with the   studies conducted to date. The study showed factors that influ-
                   medical centers varying in size from 326 to 1517 beds. The hos-  chosen from each hospital, for a total sample size of 960 hos-  four Israeli health maintenance organizations, initiated a study   ence non-adherence in CML. The unique study involved 2546
                   pitals had different levels of sophistication in electronic medical   pitalizations. Comparison among groups was conducted using   to develop PROMs for patients with diabetes. The process of   patients from 63 countries who completed a patient-driven sur-
                   chart usage, with one having a full system including CPOE and   ANOVA or chi-square for continuous variables and propor-  determining the PROMs was conducted in collaboration with   vey on ways to improve adherence, including dissemination of
                   the other three having a partial system. The study population   tions, respectively.                          patient focus groups, expert groups, and consultations with an   information about the disease and medication, management of
                   comprised patients who had been hospitalized in internal medi-  To validate the research tool, sensitivity was calculated using   international diabetes consortia for health outcome measure-  side effects, and support from hematologists. Sherf highlighted
                   cine and surgical departments between January and December   the ADEs identified by the Trigger Tool and those found by   ments. Three patient focus groups were conducted, including   many of the important roles that patient advocacy groups have,
                   2014 at each of the four hospitals studied. Inclusion criteria were   chart reviews. In addition, the PPV of each trigger was calcu-  one with Arabic speaking patients. The participants identi-  including support and empowerment of patients, advocacy, and
                   hospitalized patients 18 years of age or older with a hospital   lated by dividing the ADEs actually found with those identified   fied areas that were important to them. These topics included   support of advancement in research and therapy. This increased
                   stay between 2 days and 1 month. All hospitalizations that met   by the triggers in the same cases. Based on previous studies in   physical functioning, reduction of symptoms (e.g., abdominal   patient involvement, according to Sherf, will lead to a better
                   the inclusion criteria were included. We then randomly selected   which low PPV resulted in the withdrawal of the tool, PPV   pain, dizziness, tiredness, sleepiness, weakness, dry mouth,   diagnosis and prognosis, more effective clinical trial partici-
                   hospitalizations to be included in the study sample using   above 10% was required to justify further use of the Trigger   leg numbness), mental state, and reduction of hypoglycemia.   pation, further access to therapies, and better optimization of
                   Microsoft Excel (version 14.0.6212.5000) software (Microsoft   Tool [17]. All analyses were two-tailed and P ≤ 0.05 was con-  An emphasis was also placed on the ability to manage therapy   treatment selection.
                   Corp, Richmond, CA, USA). The study was approved by the   sidered significant.                                and self-efficacy. For patients, important factors of treatment
                   institutional review board at each of the participating hospitals.                                            successes included having interdisciplinary treatment in one   pATIEnT InVOlVEMEnT: DEVElOpMEnT Of TRAInIng pROgRAMS
                                                                                                                                 place and at the same visit, receiving information about the dis-  Dr. Karen Hershkop, head of the Diabetes Education Program
                   CHART REVIEw fOR ADVERSE DRug EVEnTS            RESULTS                                                       ease and treatments available, hosting patient support groups,   at the OTZMA Diabetes Care Initiative, focused on patient
                   ADE identification and characterization was conducted using   Two triggers originally present in the IHI tool were deemed   maintaining a permanent framework for care, initiating routine   involvement in developing training programs with specific
                   the methodology as set by the IHI [10]. Prior to the study initia-  irrelevant to the Israeli healthcare practice and thus were   follow-up care, and demonstrating care and empathy. Findings   emphasis on the diabetes educators program in Israel. While
                   tion, all listed researchers reviewed the various ADE triggers   excluded: flumazenil administration (T3) due to updated   from patient focus groups, local experts, and international dia-  developing this program, focus groups of patients and health-
                   and discussed the need for trigger adaptation. Decisions regard-  guidelines for its use and prolonged PTT (T10) due to the   betes consortia were included in the selection and construction   care providers were involved to define the role of diabetes
                   ing changes were reached only by consensus. Hospitalization   limited use of unfractionated heparin in internal medicine   of PROMs questionnaires for diabetes and, together with the   educators as well as to understand the requirements necessary
                   charts were initially reviewed by a research nurse to identify   and general surgery departments. During the study period, a   quality indicators, provided a comprehensive picture of the   for their training. Follow-up interviews 1 to 3 years post-train-
                   triggers and potential ADEs. We reviewed physician orders,   total of 421 triggers in 279 hospitalizations were identified, of   treatment of diabetes in Israel.  ing were conducted. All participants noted that the training
                   medication lists, laboratory reports, admission histories,   which 75 ADEs among 72 hospitalizations (7.5%, 95% con-                                          program was of added value to practitioners in the diabetes
                   progress and consultation notes, discharge summaries, and   fidence interval [95%CI] 5.8–9.2) were confirmed [Table 1].   pATIEnT InVOlVEMEnT: pOlICy MAKIng  field and 81% felt that the program contributes to their daily
                   nursing notes. For each record, the total medication dose was   The calculated mean PPV was 17.81%, with between-hospital   Naama Ron, a representative of the Ministry of Health,   professional work (publication in process). Having the patient
                   manually recorded. Data were abstracted and summarized into   variation of 11.83–24.21% (P = 0.128). Two ADEs were identi-  explained the public involvement in policy making within the   participate in the teaching process started in 1903, when Sir
                   electronic forms by trained research nurses. Subsequently, each   fied only by chart review but were not detected by the Trigger   ministry. Between 2016 and 2017, the Strategic and Financial   William Osler addressed the New York Academy of Medicine
                   form was independently reviewed by two physicians (who were   Tool (sensitivity of 97%). Compared to patients without ADEs,   Planning Administration, in cooperation with the Medical   saying, “In what may be called the natural method of teaching,
       666                                                                                                                                                                                                                             723
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9