Page 75 - 20818_park-c_efi
P. 75

20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 3 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:46:23 | SR:-- | Cyan
 20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 3 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:46:23 | SR:-- | Black
 #20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 3 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:46:23 | SR:-- | Yellow
 20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 3 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:46:23 | SR:-- | Magenta
 #
 sad, and bitter for one week each month. Her husband did not un-  3.  In a case like this, if a girl underwent surgery for congenital cat-
 derstand why, since they told him it was happenstance. Once they   aract and knows that it is a hereditary condition, can she conceal
 said it was an illness with high fever. Another time, they said, “this   these facts in order to be able to get married?
 is how women react to the pain of menstruation,” and he believed   4. If a child is suffering from retinitis pigmentosa, which is a dom-
 them because he was young. However, as the days passed and the   inant, hereditary illness causing blindness at fifteen-to-twenty
 illness became permanent, he sought out a remedy. He was afraid she   years of age, are they obligated to reveal this disorder to their
 had some type of epilepsy since she told him that sometimes she saw   potential spouses in the future? What is the physician’s obliga-
 black and her vital organs would tremble. The physician ruled out   tion in this case?
 epilepsy, but did not want to reveal the nature of the disease for fear   Professor P. Namet, Director of Ophthalmology
 that the couple would separate.  Department, Assaf Harofeh Hospital

 After she gave birth, she got sick again and went totally of her
 mind, to the point that she broke utensils and tore her clothes and   1   AnsweR
 was  forcibly  restrained for  more than half a year.  The husband
 learned that she had been sick even before the wedding, but she had   There are illnesses which, if not told to the spouse, nullify the mar-
 told him nothing. Ultimately beis din ruled that she leave the marriage   riage as a mistaken transaction. For example, if one becomes engaged
 with no kesubah, since it was a mistaken transaction, and especially   to a woman and she turns out to be infertile, the kiddushin is null and
 since she conducted herself improperly by not revealing her illness.   void, and she needs no bill of divorce, because the transaction was
 Although she did not have the cognitive ability to accept a get, the   a mistake (Even Ha’ezer #39, Beis Shmuel #15). So, too, if a woman
 beis din allowed him to remarry with the permission of one hundred   marries a man and he is found to lack male potency, it is a mistaken
 Rabbanim, on condition that the beis din determine with certainty   transaction. As explained in the Ein Yitzchak (#24:10), his condition
 that she had had this defect before the marriage.  is worse than that of an infertile woman, because the latter is able to
 From the words of the Ohr Gadol it seems that the physician acted   live a normal marital life, while he is doubly stricken: he cannot have
 contrary to the halacha, since he was obligated to reveal the nature of   children and he cannot live a normal marital life.
 the mental malady to the husband. The same applies in our case as    If a man turns out to be an epileptic, some poskim rule that we do
 well.     not force him to give his wife a bill of divorce if she wants to separate
           from him. Other poskim rule that this is considered a blemish on a
 If the couple says that they do not want to know which one of   man and we force him to divorce her, as explained in the Rama (Even
 them is the carrier of the disease, they have shown that they consent-  Haezer #154:5).
 ed to the marriage in spite of the disease, and then one need not reveal   Similarly, Responsa Chavas Ya’ir (#220) deals with the question of
 it to them.
           a groom who wanted to nullify his engagement because his bride’s
        nose was longer than usual. He answered that “it seems that if the
 Up to here, we have addressed the possibility of the prohibition   length of the nose is not so prominent, meaning that most people
 between man and his fellow, which is deception and a mistaken   would not laugh at her, then his claim is worthless.”
 transaction. Now we address the second issue, which is the mitzvah   There was once a groom who found out that his bride was blem-
 of procreation.  ished: Her eye-lids were exceptionally closed, to the point that if




 72   1  Medical-HalacHic Responsa of Rav ZilbeRstein  Hereditary Vision Defects  2   61
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80