Page 22 - MIN SOCIAL - MAY 19 ,2015
P. 22

TECHNOLOGY A23
                                                                                                                Tuesday 19 May 2015

Court agrees Samsung copied Apple, but tosses some damages

BRANDON BAILEY                  In this Aug. 6, 2014 file photo, a poster advertises Samsung Electronics’ Galaxy S5 LTE-A, right, and Apple’s iPhone 5s at a mobile
AP Technology Writer            phone shop in Seoul, South Korea.
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) A
federal appeals court has                                                                                                                                                                            Associated Press
upheld a jury’s finding that
Samsung illegally copied        monetary awards by argu-       CEO: Nissan will be ready with
some patented features in       ing that Samsung copied        autonomous driving by 2020
Apple’s iPhone, but it sided    some of its products, it had
with Samsung on one point       less success in persuad-       YURI KAGEYAMA                 Nissan Motor Co. Chief Executive Carlos Ghosn speaks to re-
that could reduce the $930      ing courts to issue injunc-    AP Business Writer            porters at the automaker’s headquarters in Yokohama, near To-
million in damages the          tions that would have kept     YOKOHAMA, Japan (AP) —        kyo, Monday, May 18, 2015.
South Korean company            Samsung’s versions off the     Nissan Motor Co. will have
had been ordered to pay.        market. But since then, the    vehicles packed with au-                                                                          Associated Press
The ruling, coming three        California company’s lat-      tonomous driving technol-
years after an epic court-      est iPhone models have         ogy by 2020 but whether       determine future cars,         Ghosn said Nissan sees au-
room battle between two         been phenomenally pop-         people will be able to drive  show that is what they         tonomous vehicles as add-
tech industry giants, could     ular and profitable while      them on roads is up to gov-   want, along with connec-       ing to driving pleasure, and
mean yet another trial over     Samsung has lost ground        ernment regulators,           tivity and zero, or very low,  a totally driver-less car is
a portion of damages rep-       in key markets to competi-     Chief Executive Carlos        emissions.                     not at the center of the au-
resenting more than a third     tors ranging from Apple to     Ghosn said Monday.            Connectivity means ac-         tomaker’s plans.
of the total award. Legal       China’s Xiaomi.                Many of the world’s auto-     cessing the Internet, see-     The autonomous driving
experts, however, say the       Samsung and Apple              makers, and companies         ing movies and duplicat-       Nissan foresees will assist or
rivals may be more inclined     agreed last year to set-       outside the auto industry     ing in the vehicle the other   enhance driving, he said.
to negotiate a settlement       tle all patent disputes still  such as Google, are work-     experiences a person has       Nissan may end up with a
this time around.               pending outside the United     ing on technologies that      at home or in the office,      driverless car,
“When this case was first       States. Some experts be-       allow cars to navigate        Ghosn said.                    but that was not the auto-
filed, it was a big deal. But   lieve the companies were       without human interven-       On zero emissions, he reit-    maker’s goal, he said.
I don’t think the litigation    awaiting the outcome of        tion.                         erated that Nissan is bank-    “That is the car of the fu-
has served all the purposes     appeals in two U.S. cases      Ghosn said good progress      ing on electric cars, rather   ture,” he said.
that Apple and Samsung          before settling here.          is being made toward the      than other zero-emissions      “But the consumer is more
originally desired,” said       Monday’s ruling orders         Japanese automaker’s          technologies, for the near-    conservative,” he said.
Michael Carrier, a Rutgers      a trial court in San Jose,     goal of delivering that       term future. Nissan makes      “That makes us cautious.”q
law professor who has fol-      California, to reconsider      technology by 2020.           the Leaf electric car.
lowed the dispute closely.      about $382 million in dam-     “Our cars will be ready,”
In its decision Monday, the     ages that jurors previously    he said.
U.S. Federal Circuit Court      awarded for the “trade         The bigger hurdle for such
of Appeals upheld most of       dress” claims, which in-       vehicles becoming readily
the findings made by a Cal-     volved six models of Sam-      available to consumers is
ifornia federal jury in 2012.   sung phones. Santa Clara       approval from regulators
The jury concluded that         University law professor Bri-  around the world, he told
several models of Samsung       an Love said Apple could       reporters at Yokohama
smartphones and tablets         still argue it’s entitled to   headquarters.
had illegally copied the        those damages, however,        Ghosn said autonomous
iPhone and infringed on         since the same models          driving was sure to be part
some of Apple’s patents         were also found to have        of the cars of the future
for technology and design       infringed on patents.          because market studies
including touch-screen          The same case has already      with consumers, especially
controls that let users         seen one retrial: After a      younger drivers, who will
“pinch” or “double-tap” to      judge cut $450 million from
shrink or enlarge an image.     an original damage award
Although it upheld the pat-     of more than $1 billion. q
ent claims, the Washing-
ton, D.C.-based appeals
court said Apple wasn’t
entitled to damages for its
claims that Samsung had
copied the iPhone’s “trade
dress” or overall appear-
ance.
The long-running case was
one of several lawsuits in
which Apple, Samsung
and other tech companies
locked horns in a global
battle for pre-eminence in
the smartphone market.
Today the smartphone
business is still booming, but
the battles have largely
shifted away from the legal
arena.
While Apple won large
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27