Page 563 - ITGC_Audit Guides
P. 563

GTAG —  BCM Requirements





            A.  Types of Exercises

               Exercise Type                               Description and Objectives

             Desk Check or        This is the least invasive type of exercise/test generally still considered a test. A desk check
             Plan Audit           normally involves only the plan owner and perhaps a disinterested third party. The goal of this
                                  type of effort is simply to ensure that content inside the plan is not outdated (e.g., contact infor-
                                  mation) and that the general thrust of the plan is still relevant. It normally includes a simple
                                  page-by-page reading and updating of the plan itself.
                                  objectives:
                                     •   Ensure team members are accurate.
                                     •   Ensure internal and external contact numbers are current.
             Orientation or       Especially after a BC or CM plan has been recently adopted or significantly enhanced, it is
             Plan Walkthrough     helpful to walk through the document informally with those expected to implement it. The
                                  effort would include a team meeting facilitated by a designated team leader. Normally, this type
                                  of low-intensity event does not constitute a “test” in terms of an organization’s BCM policy
                                  requirement.

                                  objectives:
                                     •   Ensure team members understand their new/updated roles.
                                     •   Ensure team members understand basic plan content and format.
             Tabletop Exercise    In many cases, it is helpful to bring the entire BC/CM team together for a session to work collab-
             (Boardroom           oratively through a realistic scenario to identify challenges and build rapport in solving them
             Style Exercise)      together. Generally, these exercises last two to four hours and are facilitated either by the BC/
                                  CM manager or an independent third party. The effort concludes with a formal exercise critique
                                  detailing whether pre-established exercise objectives were met and outlining gaps uncovered in
                                  the event with a remediation timeline as well as next steps to be performed.
                                  objectives:
                                     •   Help team members understand the importance of their roles and responsibilities.
                                     •   See the benefit of solving continuity/crisis challenges as a team.
                                     •   Identify specific planning/training gaps across functional areas.

             Communication        Communication is a key component of a BCM process. In fact, failure to communicate accu-
             Testing              rately to key stakeholders is a frequent cause of failed crisis responses. These tests vary widely
                                  depending on the scope of communications planning and level of automation used in the crisis
                                  communications process. Companies that have deployed a mass notification tool realize a double
                                  benefit from their exercise: evaluating the tool’s performance and exposing participants to how
                                  the notification will be received. Normally, this type of event involves actually contacting busi-
                                  ness partners and employees, not simply reviewing contact list information.
                                  objectives:
                                     •   Validate the contact information of key stakeholders.
                                     •   Train  participants  in  how  to  use  mass  notification  and  any  role  they  have  in  the
                                        response.
                                     •   Properly configure mass notification tools.
                                     •   Identify communication gaps/bottlenecks where timely communication could falter in
                                        an event.











                                                             16
   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568