Page 59 - Acertaining Economic Damages Calculation
P. 59

While the damages may not be determined by mere speculation or guess, it is enough if the evi-
                       dence shows the extent of the damages as a matter of just and reasonable inference, although the
                       result be only approximate.

                       However, the plaintiff must establish his damage by the most accurate basis possible under the
                       circumstances. He must produce the best evidence reasonably obtainable.  fn 2

               There are hundreds of case opinions in which references to best evidence are made by plaintiffs (who
               claim that they are using the best evidence to support their claim for damages), defendants (who assert
               that the plaintiff has ignored the best evidence, making their damage claims inadmissible), and judges
               (who weigh in and decide whether or not the parties have relied upon the best evidence in their effort to
               establish damages with reasonable certainty), including the following examples:

               Mid-America Tablewares, Inc. v. Mogi Trading Co., Ltd., 100 F.3d 1353, 1365 (7th Cir. 1996) (empha-
               sis added)

                       Where the defendant's wrong has caused the difficulty of proof of damages, he cannot complain
                       of the resulting uncertainty and if the best evidence of the damage of which the situation admits
                       is furnished, this is sufficient. Charles T. McCormick, McCormick Handbook on Damages § 27
                       at 101.


                              __________

               Alaska Pulp Corp., Inc. v. United States, 59 Fed. Cl. 400, 418 (Ct. Fed. Cl. 2004) (emphasis added)

                       The best evidence we have to go on are Plaintiff's own contemporaneous assessments of TTRA's
                       impact.

                              __________

               Adell v. John Richards Homes Bldg. Co., L.L.C. (In re John Richards Homes Building Co., L.L.C.), 439
               F.3d 248, 263 (6th Cir. 2006) (emphasis added)

                       [Expert] testified that given JRH's recent creation, the best evidence of its future profits was the
                       past profits of the Affiliates, whose business it was taking over.

                              __________

               Bessemer Trust Co., N.A. v. Branin, 544 F. Supp. 2d 385, 391 (SDNY 2008) (emphasis added)


                       Since an arms-length transaction is the best evidence of fair market value... the Court finds that
                       the actual purchase price is the most appropriate reflection of Brundage’s value.


                              __________






        fn 2   Sunward Corp.; 811 F.2d at 541, quoting Hoffer Oil Corp. v. Carpenter, 34 F.2d 589, 592 (10th Cir. 1929), cert. denied, 280 U.S.
        608 (1930) (emphasis added).


                               © 2020 Association of International Certified Professional Accountants             57
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64