Page 355 - TaxAdviser_2022
P. 355

S CORPORATIONS




         but less than $1 million, the user fee is   stock on the date the corporation files its   ruling or pay a user fee. Despite this,
         $8,500.3                          S election must consent to the election.5   Letter Ruling 202205018 requested re-
           For an S corporation, the term “gross   If there are joint owners of any block of   lief for failure of a spouse to file a timely
         income” for purposes of this test is total   stock, all the owners must consent.6 The   consent. The problem with the situation
         income (line 6 on Form 1120-S, U.S.   IRS, by regulation, has permitted late   here was that there was no joint owner-
         Income Tax Return for an S Corpora-  consents if there is reasonable cause for   ship. The corporation issued stock to one
         tion), plus cost of goods sold (line 2).   the delinquency.         spouse, but the other spouse consented
         The corporation must also include gross   When the joint ownership is a result   to the corporation’s S election. The IRS
         rents reported on Form 8825, Rental Real   of a community property law, Rev. Proc.   treated the election as inadvertently inval-
         Estate Income and Expenses of a Partnership   2004-35 allows the couple to file a state-  id and granted the corporation’s election.
         or an S Corporation. The period for testing   ment with the service center where the
         is the last full (12-month) tax year ending   corporation files its returns.7 Unlike Rev.   Sec. 1366: Passthrough of
         before the date the request is filed. More-  Proc. 2013-30, which deals with certain   items to shareholders
         over, if one shareholder owns more than   late elections, there is no time limit on   Sec. 1366 provides that shareholders
         50% of the corporation’s stock, the corpo-  the consent for the community interest   include their ratable share of separately
         ration must include the gross income of   holder.8 Conceivably, the joint owner   and nonseparately stated items for the
         the shareholder.4                 could have been required to consent to   tax year on a per share, per day basis,
           Consent to corporation’s S      a Subchapter S election in the year 1958   whether or not any income is actu-
         election: Letter Ruling 202205018 ad-  and would still be within the domain   ally distributed. Tax-exempt income
         dressed a situation involving a spouse’s   of Rev. Proc. 2004-35. Moreover, since   is among the separately stated items.
         failure to consent to an S election. Under   the service center administers the relief,   Generally, ordinary and necessary busi-
         Sec. 1362(a)(2), each person who owns   there is no need to apply for a letter   ness expenses paid by the S corporation,




         3. Rev. Proc. 2022-1, Appendix A, clause (A)(4).   6. Regs. Sec. 1.1362-6(b)(2)(i).
         4. Rev. Proc. 2022-1, Appendix A, clauses (B)(4) and (5).  7. Rev. Proc. 2004-35.
         5. Regs. Sec. 1.1362-6(b)(3), effective for tax years beginning after 1992 (T.D.   8. Rev. Proc. 2013-30 limits the period in which a service center can grant
           8449, issued Nov. 24, 1992).                       relief to three years and 75 days from the effective date of the election.






           EXECUTIVE SUMMARY                 •  The Service issued a notice    letter rulings requesting late
                                              addressing whether a             S corporation election relief.
            •  Three revenue procedures ad-   majority owner’s (or spouse’s)
              dressed the timing of tax-exempt   compensation constitutes    •  The Tax Court ruled on how
              income and corresponding basis   qualified wages in calculating the   to characterize the economic
              inclusion from forgiven Paycheck   employee retention credit.    benefits of a split-dollar life
              Protection Program loans.                                        insurance arrangement.
                                             •  New final regulations provide   In another case, the court
            •  With respect to the federal cap   relief from classification as a   addressed issues surrounding
              on state and local tax deduc-   syndicate, which can cause an    S corporation distributions and
              tions, the IRS issued a notice   entity to lose its ability to use   compensation for services of a
              and announced that it intends to   the cash method of accounting,   shareholder.
              propose regulations concerning   among other things.
              creditable passthrough entity
              taxes that many states have    •  A recent revenue procedure
              enacted.                        reduces the user fee for private







         24  July 2022                                                                        The Tax Adviser
   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360