Page 396 - TaxAdviser_2022
P. 396

gross estate (Examples 1–3; see also   decedent dies on or after the publica-  adjustments. It is also assumed that the
            Rev. Rul. 84-25).              tion date of April 27, 2022. It is worth   donor’s executor does not elect to use the
         (C)  Gifts with a retained interest   noting that any completed gifts that   alternate valuation date, and, unless oth-
            within the meaning of Regs.    are ultimately included in a decedent’s   erwise stated, the donor never married
            Secs.  25.2701-5(a)(4) and 25.2702-  gross estate would also be removed   and made no other gifts during life.
            6(a)(1). Sec. 2701 deals with special   from the adjusted taxable gifts reported   Example 1: The example deals with
            valuation rules for transfers of   on Form 706, United States Estate (and   a situation where individual A gifts a
            certain interests in partnerships and   Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax    $9 million promissory note to another
            corporations to “applicable fam-  Return, at the value on the date of    individual during the TCJA period, and
            ily members,” and Sec. 2702 deals   transfer under Sec. 2001(b)(2).   the full principal balance of the note
            with special valuation rules for the   The following is a list of the Code   remains unpaid at A’s death after the
            transfer of interests in trusts. No ex-  sections referenced under Regs. Sec.   TCJA period ends on Dec. 31, 2025.
            amples are provided in the proposed   20.2010-1(c)(3)(i)(A) where the    Since the payment of the note would be
            regulations.                   transfer would be excepted from the   satisfied with other assets of the estate,
         (D) Transfers that would fall under   special rule and included in the above    the initial gift is disregarded, and the
            Prop. Regs. Sec. 20.2010-1(c)(3)  carveout provisions:           note’s value is includible in the gross
            (i)(A), (B), or (C) above were it   ■   Sec. 2035, Adjustments for certain    estate. (Effectively, the liability under
            not for the transfer, elimination,   gifts made within three years of   the note is ignored on Form 706, and
            or relinquishment of the interest   decedent’s death;            the assets that would ultimately fund
            or power that would have caused   ■   Sec. 2036, Transfers with retained    the note repayment are included at full
            inclusion in the gross estate within   life estate;              value.) This situation would meet the
            18 months prior to the donor’s date   ■   Sec. 2037, Transfers taking effect    “Type B” exception to the special rule
            of death. This includes transactions   at death;                 listed above, and as such, the BEA of
            executed by a third party (refer-  ■   Sec. 2038, Revocable transfers; and  only $6.8 million available at death
            enced in Example 1 of the proposed   ■   Sec. 2042, Proceeds of life insurance.  could be used to offset that $9 million
            regulations).                    Further, under Sec. 2038(a)(1), the   in assets.
           The special rule will continue to   value of the gross estate includes the   Example 2: This example adjusts the
         apply to the transfers listed above when:  value of all property to the extent of any   first example by reducing A’s note to $2
         ■   The taxable amount of the gift is not   interest therein of which the decedent   million and adding in another $9 million
           material. This is determined at the   has at any time made a transfer (except   cash gift on the same date the note was
           date of transfer and applies when the   for adequate and full consideration in   gifted. This is a fairly straightforward
           taxable amount is 5% or less of the   money or money’s worth), by trust or   extension of the first example in that the
           total amount of the transfer. Example   otherwise, where the enjoyment thereof   $2 million note gift would essentially be
           4 of the proposed regulations ad-  was subject at the date of death to any   ignored on the Form 706 filing, and A’s
           dresses this de minimis scenario.  change through the exercise of a power   executor would be able to use the special
         ■   The transfer, elimination, or   by the decedent (alone or with another   rule to claim $9 million of BEA on the
           relinquishment, within 18 months   person) to alter, amend, revoke, or termi-  Form 706 related to the completed gift
           of the donor’s date of death, was   nate that property transfer.  of $9 million in cash during the TCJA
           included in the original instrument                               period.
           of transfer, whether by death or   Examples                         Example 4: This example switches
           lapse of time. (This would be the   The proposed regulations include several   the facts, with individual B transferring
           case with a grantor retained annuity   examples that are helpful in understand-  $9 million in assets to a GRAT with
           trust (GRAT) or a qualified personal   ing these exceptions to the special rule   the retained qualified annuity interest
           residence trust (QPRT) where the   (Prop. Regs. Secs. 20.2010-1(c)(3)(iii)  calculated at $8.55 million and, as such,
           trust has a fixed term and should   (A) through (G)). The most relevant   a taxable gift value of $450,000 at the
           not be subject to the exception   examples are outlined below. As the   time of transfer. (This is a “Type A”
           to the special rule simply because   proposed regulations indicate, in each   exception to the special rule.) Individual
           the grantor dies within 18 months   example, the BEA on the date of the   B then died during the GRAT term,
           following that fixed term.)     gift was $11.4 million, the BEA on the   resulting in the recapture of the entire
           Note that the proposed regula-  date of death is $6.8 million, and both   GRAT corpus in B’s gross estate under
         tions would apply to estates where the   amounts include hypothetical inflation   Regs. Sec. 20.2036-1(c)(2). The example



         www.thetaxadviser.com                                                                 August 2022 13
   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401