Page 401 - TaxAdviser_2022
P. 401

TAX CLINIC





          Sec. 404(a)(5) states that a deduction for any deferred compensation
                 is only allowable in the tax year in which the compensation
              is includible in the employee’s gross income as compensation.






         highlighted how complications can   paid or incurred during the tax year in   assets, the cash-basis seller includes the
         arise in this context.            carrying on a trade or business. If costs   liability in the amount realized (see Sec.
           In this case, Hoops LP (Hoops), the   are contributed by an employer under a   1001), even though it has not been re-
         owners of the NBA team the Memphis   plan of deferred compensation, however,   corded for tax purposes, but also receives
         Grizzlies, in 2021 sold the franchise   the deduction of these costs is governed   an immediate deduction as if the liability
         to Memphis Basketball LLC. In the   by Sec. 404(a). Sec. 404(a)(5) states that   was paid, under Regs. Sec. 1.461-4(d)
         transaction, Memphis Basketball bought   a deduction for any deferred compensa-  (5)(i). Hoops argued that in its case, it
         substantially all the assets and assumed   tion is only allowable in the tax year in   should obtain the same result under the
         the liabilities of Hoops LP. Among these   which the compensation is includible   regulation, which provides:
         liabilities were deferred compensation   in the employee’s gross income as com-
         contracts for two Grizzlies’ players, Zach   pensation. Generally, this is the year the   If, in connection with the sale or
         Randolph and Mike Conley. Under   compensation is paid. In Hoops, the issue   exchange of a trade or business by
         these contracts, at the time of the sale,   was whether the seller of a business was   a taxpayer, the purchaser expressly
         the players were owed $12.6 million of   entitled to deduct the deferred compen-  assumes a liability arising out of the
         deferred compensation for services pro-  sation costs.                trade or business that the taxpayer
         vided before the sale that were due to be   In a typical taxable asset sale, the   but for the economic performance
         paid after the sale.              general rule on assumption of liabilities   requirement would have been en-
           In computing gain on the sale, Hoops  is relatively clear. When a buyer assumes   titled to incur as of the date of the
         reported a total amount realized of $420   a seller’s liability, the assumption of that   sale, economic performance with
         million, which included $220 million   liability is included in the consideration   respect to that liability occurs as the
         of assumed liabilities and other adjust-  paid to the seller. From the buyer’s per-  amount of the liability is properly
         ments. In determining the amount real-  spective, the assumption of liabilities is   included in the amount realized on
         ized, Hoops included $10.7 million (the   treated as an additional amount “paid”   the transaction by the taxpayer.
         present value of the $12.6 million owed   by the buyer to acquire the assets. That
         to Randolph and Conley) for Memphis   amount is capitalized and added to   The Hoops case
         Basketball’s assumption of the deferred   the buyer’s basis for the assets acquired   Similar to the cash-basis example above,
         compensation liability.           at the time the liability is treated as   Hoops argued that under Regs. Sec.
           Hoops did not claim the deduction   incurred under the buyer’s method of   1.461-4(d)(5)(i), economic performance
         of $10.7 million related to the deferred   accounting. If the buyer does not get a   occurred at the time of the NBA
         compensation liability on its original tax   deduction for the payment of the liabil-  franchise sales transaction, allowing an
         return, nor did it reduce its amount real-  ity, who does? Depending on the type of   acceleration of the deduction for the
         ized on the sale for the deferred com-  liability, that answer is not so clear, and   deferred compensation. In rejecting this
         pensation liability. However, Hoops later   the tax treatment for the seller may not   argument, the court noted that the tim-
         amended its tax return and claimed the   be symmetrical to the buyer.  ing restrictions of Sec. 404(a)(5), which
         $10.7 million as a compensation deduc-  Consider an example where the buyer   govern the timing of the deduction for
         tion. In March 2018, the IRS disallowed   assumes an operating expense liability   deferred compensation, do not allow
         the deduction.                    (accounts payable or accrued expense)   an employer to deduct a compensation
                                           of the seller, but the seller uses the cash   payment until it is included in the em-
         Deductibility of deferred         method of accounting (expenses gener-  ployee’s income (i.e., it is paid to the em-
         compensation                      ally deducted as paid) and, therefore, has   ployee). Thus, Hoops’ reliance on Regs.
         Sec. 162(a) generally allows a deduction   not taken a deduction related to the un-  Sec. 1.461-4(d)(5)(i) was misplaced be-
         for all ordinary and necessary expenses   paid liability. At the time of the sale of   cause it was the Sec. 404(a)(5) deduction



         18  August 2022                                                                      The Tax Adviser
   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406