Page 406 - TaxAdviser_2022
P. 406

(PoS). PoS validators (somewhat   an income tax code section, the broad   deductions of state and local taxes
         comparable to bitcoin miners) “stake”   definition of “digital assets” (“ ‘digital   (SALT), dramatically affecting certain
         their tokens to earn rewards as a “block   asset’ means any digital representation   taxpayers. The cap led some taxpayers
         producer” on the network. The rewards   of value which is recorded on a crypto-  to contemplate changing their state of
         are earned for supporting the network   graphically secured distributed ledger   residency because their states impose a
         and arguably for providing a service to   or any similar technology as specified   higher-than-average tax rate on personal
         the network. The IRS has not currently   by the Secretary” (Infrastructure Act,   income. States’ reactions were quick in
         released any specific guidance around   §80603(b)(1)(D)) may be suggestive of   a few cases, but many awaited guidance,
         staking activities. This has left many   future tax guidance. Additionally, Sens.   which the IRS eventually offered in
         private fund managers with uncertainty   Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., and Kirsten   Notice 2020-75.
         about whether PoS validating rewards   E. Gillibrand, D-N.Y., released their   Fast-forward four years, and 27
         are considered U.S. trade or business   draft legislation, S. 4356, the Respon-  states along with one other jurisdiction
         income and are subject to withholding   sible Financial Innovation Act (RFIA),   have enacted a version of a PTE taxing
         on allocations to non-U.S. investors.  on June 7, containing expansive tax   election with another four proposals
           While the mining of bitcoin (which   positions addressing some of the items   in the works. This election pushes the
         uses the “proof of work” (PoW) con-  outlined above.                responsibility for paying SALT income
         sensus mechanism) may rise to the level   Many issues besides those addressed   taxes on flowthrough income up to the
         of a trade or business activity pursuant   above remain unclear for private fund   PTE and allows it to deduct those taxes
         to Notice 2014-21 and the IRS FAQs   managers. Tax advisers should focus   at the entity level under the provisions
         released in 2019, PoS is inherently dif-  on developing reasonable reporting   of Notice 2020-75, simultaneously
         ferent from PoW. For example, PoS   positions consistently applied in good   providing a credit to the owners to avoid
         validators “lock” a portion of tokens to   faith while the industry awaits defini-  double taxation. Unfortunately for the
         earn the right to be a block producer,   tive guidance.             practitioner, the only thing that can be
         while miners must solve an algorithmic   From Cynthia M. Pedersen, J.D.,   relied on consistently regarding state
         problem to earn the right as a block   LL.M., Baltimore             PTE elections is inconsistency.
         producer. Nevertheless, the purpose and                               As a result, practitioners may face a
         the end result of a token reward are the                            difficult analysis in helping their clients
         same. Both PoW miners and PoS valida-  State & Local Taxes          understand their possible PTE election
         tors keep the blockchains operational.                              opportunities. A single state election can
         Therefore, if a private fund manager is   State PTE elections: A big   be complex on its own, let alone navi-
         acting as a PoS validator, the rewards   picture perspective        gating the differences among multiple
         earned may be considered U.S. trade or   Rarely does new state and local tax   states’ elections on seemingly minor
         business income (ECI) and subject to   legislation cause a sigh of relief for   mechanics that can have broad ramifica-
         withholding on allocations to non-U.S.   taxpayers or practitioners. While the   tions. To avoid increasing a taxpayer’s
         investors. This treatment depends on the   parties responsible for tax reform may   liability, practitioners should consider
         sourcing of such rewards. If the private   lead with best intentions for easing the   the following steps, and discuss them
         fund manager is located within the   burden of those involved, a new state or   with clients, before making a state PTE
         United States, or delegates the activity   local tax law typically signals yet another   election.
         to an agent located within the United   layer of difficulty tacked onto an already
         States, there is an argument that such   difficult subject. And to make matters   Step 1: Determining the
         rewards may be considered ECI.    worse, when thinking of the number of   opportunity
                                           domestic state and local tax jurisdictions,   Which states currently offer
         Congress and federal agencies     one quickly realizes no two govern-  a PTE election? With so much
         are slowly issuing guidance       ing bodies are likely to implement or   information available on the topic
         Congress passed and President Joe   execute new tax laws consistently across   of PTE elections, it is important to
         Biden signed into law the Infrastructure   the landscape.           determine what opportunities are
         Investment and Jobs Act, P.L. 117-58   That is the case for state passthrough   available to taxpayers prior to diving into
         (the Infrastructure Act), which for   entity (PTE) “taxing” elections. Begin-  the details. As previously mentioned,
         the first time codified a definition of   ning in 2018, the law known as the Tax   32 state and local jurisdictions have
         cryptoassets for information reporting   Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), P.L. 115-97,   taken some form of action, including
         required by brokers. Although this is not   introduced a cap of $10,000 for itemized   Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California,



         www.thetaxadviser.com                                                                 August 2022 23
   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411