Page 54 - TaxAdviser_Jan_Apr23_Neat
P. 54

TAX TRENDS




         which the possibility of future appellate   therein” and “pending,” the Third Circuit   collection of a tax debt. The earliest tax
         review expired.                   held that the action was filed timely.   liability at issue in the case was from
           The Third Circuit found that only the   The court found that at least 129 days   1986; the IRS assessment occurred
         second definition worked for purposes of   remained in the statute-of-limitation   in 1994. On top of the approximately
         Sec. 6330(e)(1). The tolling clause in Sec.   period when the D.C. Circuit issued its   five years that collection was barred
         6330(e)(1) identifies a singular “period”   mandate and that, under the applicable   because he was engaged in bankruptcy
         of suspension, but the first definition of   meanings of “appeals therein” and “pend-  proceedings, Weiss, through his series
         “pending” would involve several distinct   ing,” the limitation period was not re-  of administrative and judicial appeals,
         periods of piecemeal tolling. In the court’s  duced either by the time that Weiss took   avoided collection of tax that he
         view, if Congress had intended to account   to file his petition for a writ of certiorari   admitted on returns that he owed for
         for such intermittent tolling, it could have   (62 days) or by the time that the Supreme  another 23 years.
         used the word “periods.” Therefore, Con-  Court took to deny the petition (40 days).   Weiss, No. 21-1592 (3d Cir. 11/2/22) ■
         gress intended that the second meaning   Thus, the court concluded that the gov-
         apply and that “pending” in Sec. 6330(e)  ernment had 129 days after the Supreme
         (1) describes a continuous period that in-  Court’s denial of Weiss’s petition to com-
         cludes not only the hearing and “appeals   mence this action, and it did so within   Contributor
         therein” but also any intervening periods   64 days, which left at least 65 days of the
                                                                              James A. Beavers, CPA, CGMA, J.D.,
         of indeterminate length during which an   10-year limitation period to spare.
                                                                              LL.M., is The Tax Adviser’s tax technical
         appeal or petition could be filed.                                   content manager. For more information
           Application of Sec. 6330(e)(1)   Reflections
                                                                              about this column, contact
         using these meanings: Applying Sec.   This case vividly illustrates how long a
                                                                              thetaxadviser@aicpa.org.
         6330 with these meanings for “appeals   determined taxpayer can string out the












            Welcome to



            the age of



            specialization.





            When you become a member of an AICPA  specialized section,
                                                 ®
            you’re joining an elite community of like-minded peers. You’re also giving
            yourself high-quality, curated content, free CPE and webcasts on hot topics, delivered
            by the sharpest minds in the profession. Most of all, you’ll get the needed support
            to flourish and grow.
            Learn more or join today: aicpa.org/sections


            © 2021 Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. All rights reserved. 2103-62839


         52  January 2023                                                                     The Tax Adviser
                                                                                                    4/29/21   9:40 AM
          2103-62839 Section Ads_CMYK.indd   2
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59