Page 5 - KZN Business Sense-Vol6 No5
P. 5

CAN A RESTRAINT OF TRADE CLAUSE BE ENFORCED


        DURING A PANDEMIC?



        Wade Ogilvie, Partner and Adrian Krige,   The question, however, is   trade clause is enforceable until   The Current Circumstances:   where it protects those
        Candidate Attorney, Corporate & Natural   whether a restraint of trade can be   proven otherwise – reinforcing   COVID-19  proprietary interests without
        Resources Team, Cox Yeats Attorneys  enforced during a pandemic?  our common law principle that   According to Stats SA, the South   which the business would
                                                                    all South Africans are free to   African economy shed 2.2 million   collapse and potentially more
                any companies have    Principles                    contract as they see fit. The onus   jobs in the second quarter of 2020   jobs would be lost.
                limped their way        Restraint of trade clauses   is therefore on the restrained   – the largest quarter to quarter
                                                                                                                                 As a restraint of trade can only
        Mthrough lockdown             generally have two aspects: a non-  employee to prove that the   decline since the survey started   be enforced when there is an
        and have survived by cutting   compete clause, which prohibits   restraint of trade clause is not   in 2008. To state the obvious,
        costs, predominantly through   the employee from having an   only unreasonable, but contrary   the pandemic has clearly had a   agreement in place, the most
        retrenching employees, and    interest in or being employed by a   to public policy.      negative impact.              pertinent time to obtain the
        developing innovative business   competitor, and a non-solicitation   In making a determination                         restraint is when the employee
                                                                                                                                first concludes the employment
        strategies to align with a changed   clause, preventing an employee   on whether a restraint is   Judges will be cognisant of the
        market. The net result: companies   from taking clients away from the   unreasonable and against public   shift in the economy and will be   contract, alternatively, when an
        have let go employees who have   employer.                  policy, the Court will consider   loath to enforce restraint of trade   employee is promoted as the offer
        the know-how to commercially    Whether a restraint of trade                              clauses in circumstances where   of promotion will be on new terms
        cripple their businesses by   clause is enforceable depends   various factors including the   an employee, due to COVID-19,   and conditions between the parties.
                                                                    duration of the restraint, the
        either competing with them, or   on several factors. Firstly, the   area in which the employee is   has been retrenched but is being   In the current economic
        “stealing” their clients.     employer must have a proprietary   restrained from operating and   prevented from putting bread on   climate, it is advisable to review
                                                                                                  the table due a restraint of trade.
          Companies are now desperately   interest worth protecting. These   whether the employee is able to   So how do companies protect   all restraint clauses to align
                                                                                                                                them with the principles set out
        seeking to protect their proprietary   interests include trade secrets,   earn a living.   their proprietary interests in these   in the Magna case, including
        interests to curtail this undesired   know-how and their client base.   Importantly, the Court held in   trying times?
        effect. The mechanism to do so is   The proprietary interest to be                                                      tailoring them such that they are
        a restraint of trade clause in the   protected must be weighed up   the Magna case that it will look   A pragmatic approach to   considered to be reasonable and
                                                                    at all the facts and circumstances
        employment contract.          against the limitation placed on   that are prevalent at the time the   restraint of trade clauses   not against public policy. 
          In order to enforce a restraint   the employee’s freedom to trade, in   restraint is sought to be enforced,   Companies should consider   Please contact us should you require
        of trade, the company would   other words, the employee’s right   and not only the commercial   constraining their restraint of   assistance or advice for your Corporate
        generally endeavour to first obtain   to earn a living using the skills and   climate in which the contact   trade clauses to protect only   & Natural Resources matters.

        an undertaking from the employee   expertise of their profession or   was originally concluded. The   those proprietary interests which   Contact us on:
        that the employee will abide by   occupation.               Court acknowledged that the   are essential to the success of the   Wayne Ogilvie
                                                                                                                                T: +27 (0)31 536 8527
        the restraint. Should the employee   In the case of Magna Alloys and   circumstances may be drastically   business. It would, in the writer’s   E: wogilvie@coxyeats.co.za

        refuse, court proceedings would   Research (SA) (Pty) Ltd v Ellis   different from those that were   view, be difficult for a Court   Adrian Krige
        need to be instituted, usually on an   1984 (4) SA 874 (A), the Court   relevant when the contract    to declare a restraint of trade   T: : +27 (0)31 536 8567
        urgent basis.                 confirmed that a restraint of   was concluded.              unenforceable in circumstances   E: akrige@coxyeats.co.za

        CORPORATE & NATURAL RESOURCES TEAM



              he Corporate and Natural   partners, an associate and three   Client relationships are viewed   The team also offers expertise in:  The team has a particular focus
              Resources team comprises   candidate attorneys. “Together   as long term commitments,   ■   Corporate Finance     on the mining, sugar, banking,
        Ta commercial team of         we tackle head on the core    with the preferred approach   ■   Corporate Advisory        manufacturing, agribusiness,
        lawyers that is optimal for its   issues of efficiency, trust, culture   being building relationships                   telecommunications, logistics,
        specialisation in the merger,   and consistency with a view to   and rapport.  This approach   ■   Competition Law      recycling and timber sectors. 
        acquisition, amalgamation and   creating a truly collaborative   allows clients to be confident   ■   Empowerment and
        restructuring space.                                                                        Transformation
                                      team of lawyers working       with the team’s legal grounding   ■   Natural Resources and Energy   Contact us on:
          Managing Partner, Michael   together, to best serve our clients’   and ability to offer pragmatic   ■   Dispute Resolution   T: +27 (0)31 536 8500
        Jackson, heads this team of four   needs,” says Jackson.    commercial solutions.                                       W: www.coxyeats.co.za


















         Michael Jackson,        Helen Jackson,           Jason Goodison,          Wade Ogilvie,           Benjamin Meadows,        Ryan Holtes,
         Team Leader,            Partner                  Partner                  Partner                 Associate                Candidate Attorney
         Managing Partner

















         Adrian Krige,           Robyn Bronstring,
         Candidate Attorney      Candidate Attorney




                                                                                                                                                           5
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10